My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/07/1999 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
1999 Park Board Packets
>
06/07/1999 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:07:34 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 11:50:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
06/07/1999
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br /> RESOLUTION# 98 - 171 <br /> The reasons and facts supporting the findings forthe adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax <br /> Increment Financing District No. 1-9, ("District No. 1-9") as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section <br /> 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: <br /> 1. Finding that the District No. 1-9 is an economic development district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, <br /> Subd. 12. <br /> Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 consist of several parcels within the City's Development District <br /> No. 1,delineated in the Plan,for the purpose of financing economic development in the City through the <br /> use of tax increment. District No. 1-9 consists of a portion of Development District No. 1 not meeting <br /> requirements for other types of tax increment financing districts,which is in the public interest because it <br /> will facilitate construction of a manufacturing facility for Midwest Veneer, H.L. Mesabi, Lino Lakes <br /> Business Center Phases 5, 6, and 7, and additional manufacturing development which will discourage <br /> commerce,industry,or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state or municipality;it will <br /> increase employment in the state,and preserve and enhance the tax base of the state. <br /> 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be <br /> expected to occur solely throughprivate investment within the reasonably foreseeablefuture and that the <br /> increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax <br /> increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the <br /> proposeddevelopment aftersubtracting thepresent value of theprojected tax increments for the maximum <br /> duration of District No. 1-9 permitted by the Plan. <br /> The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely <br /> through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future:This finding is supported by the fact <br /> that the development proposed in this plan is a manufacturing facility that meets the City's objectives for <br /> economic development. The cost of land acquisition, site and public improvements and utilities makes <br /> development of the facility infeasible without City assistance. The developers have been asked for and <br /> provided a letter as justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax increment <br /> assistance(see attachment in Appendix F). <br /> The increased market value of the site that could reasonable be expected to occur without the use of tax <br /> increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed <br /> development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration <br /> of the TIF District permitted by the Plan:The City supported this finding on the grounds that the cost of <br /> land acquisition,site and public improvements and utilities add to the total development cost. Historically, <br /> site development costs in this area have made development infeasible without tax increment assistance. <br /> This site has been marketed for at least 8 years without success. Therefore,the City reasonably determines <br /> that no other development of any kind is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance <br /> being provided to the development. Accordingly, the increased market value anticipated without tax <br /> increment assistance is$0. <br /> A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of Tax Increment <br /> Financing District No. 1-9 and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. If all <br /> ,,. development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in District No. 1-9,the total <br /> N:\MinnsotaUNOLAKE\TIFI-9\city_res.wpd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.