My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/03/1999 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
1999 Park Board Packets
>
05/03/1999 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 2:56:53 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 12:34:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/03/1999
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 9, 1998 <br /> Staff was asked if they were absolutely certain that building permits would look this good <br /> in 1999?Daryl said that between the additional building permit fees and recaptured costs, <br /> he was sure this is an attainable goal. <br /> It was noted that the City needs a six (6) month operating surplus. Staff was asked what <br /> would happen if the State decided to cut their aids to the City. Daryl explained that the <br /> City would have to use other revenue reserves. <br /> Staff was asked what their levy recommendation would be. Dave explained that a 37% <br /> rate would meet the current needs and then plan for the future and solidify the recovery <br /> process. However, he noted that staff is committed to making the 36%rate work. He felt <br /> if the Council went with the"middle of the road" approach, it demonstrates that the <br /> Council dealt with the issue. <br /> Staff was asked about the cost of moving into the new buildings. There is no budget for <br /> moving. <br /> Chris referred to the proposed tax levy and asked what happened to "sweat equity"or <br /> "sacrifice"?He suggested that the tax rate could be reduced to 34% if cuts were make in <br /> the Travel and Tuition line items and another$100,000 added to revenues. Dave <br /> explained that to get to 34%, staff would have to be cut. <br /> Caroline said that she was under the impression that the 38%had been cut to 36%after <br /> the August budget meeting at Wargo Nature Center. Kim explained that it was at 36% <br /> and then the City found out that how much tax compression was affecting the levy. Dave <br /> stated that between tax compression and the bonds, staff did what they could. He said that <br /> other than staff additions,there is nothing to cut without cutting services. <br /> Caroline suggested that if the City Council is going to begin to show that they are making <br /> cuts in the budget, a good move would be to show that everyone including Council is <br /> tightening their belts. She suggested that for the next year, Council members pay their <br /> travel and tuition expenses. John suggested cutting Council salaries. It lets residents know <br /> that Council is willing to do their part. However, he noted that Council should not loose <br /> sight of the fact that there has been cut-backs from what was originally requested. He also <br /> noted that the budget can be tied to inflation if all additional items were removed. The <br /> Council got to the 36%tax rate by conscientiously preparing this proposed budget. <br /> Caroline said that she is in favor of the 36%rate or lower if possible. <br /> John said that he favored the 36%rate,however, he had been considering the 37%rate. <br /> Andy said that he is looking at what services the Council wants to give the citizens and <br /> said he favored the 38%rate. <br /> Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.