Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 9, 1998 <br /> Staff was asked if they were absolutely certain that building permits would look this good <br /> in 1999?Daryl said that between the additional building permit fees and recaptured costs, <br /> he was sure this is an attainable goal. <br /> It was noted that the City needs a six (6) month operating surplus. Staff was asked what <br /> would happen if the State decided to cut their aids to the City. Daryl explained that the <br /> City would have to use other revenue reserves. <br /> Staff was asked what their levy recommendation would be. Dave explained that a 37% <br /> rate would meet the current needs and then plan for the future and solidify the recovery <br /> process. However, he noted that staff is committed to making the 36%rate work. He felt <br /> if the Council went with the"middle of the road" approach, it demonstrates that the <br /> Council dealt with the issue. <br /> Staff was asked about the cost of moving into the new buildings. There is no budget for <br /> moving. <br /> Chris referred to the proposed tax levy and asked what happened to "sweat equity"or <br /> "sacrifice"?He suggested that the tax rate could be reduced to 34% if cuts were make in <br /> the Travel and Tuition line items and another$100,000 added to revenues. Dave <br /> explained that to get to 34%, staff would have to be cut. <br /> Caroline said that she was under the impression that the 38%had been cut to 36%after <br /> the August budget meeting at Wargo Nature Center. Kim explained that it was at 36% <br /> and then the City found out that how much tax compression was affecting the levy. Dave <br /> stated that between tax compression and the bonds, staff did what they could. He said that <br /> other than staff additions,there is nothing to cut without cutting services. <br /> Caroline suggested that if the City Council is going to begin to show that they are making <br /> cuts in the budget, a good move would be to show that everyone including Council is <br /> tightening their belts. She suggested that for the next year, Council members pay their <br /> travel and tuition expenses. John suggested cutting Council salaries. It lets residents know <br /> that Council is willing to do their part. However, he noted that Council should not loose <br /> sight of the fact that there has been cut-backs from what was originally requested. He also <br /> noted that the budget can be tied to inflation if all additional items were removed. The <br /> Council got to the 36%tax rate by conscientiously preparing this proposed budget. <br /> Caroline said that she is in favor of the 36%rate or lower if possible. <br /> John said that he favored the 36%rate,however, he had been considering the 37%rate. <br /> Andy said that he is looking at what services the Council wants to give the citizens and <br /> said he favored the 38%rate. <br /> Page 13 <br />