My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/05/1991 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1991 Park Board Packets
>
09/05/1991 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2021 10:00:49 AM
Creation date
7/23/2021 2:44:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
09/05/1991
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42 acres <br />In the multi -family example of the Wenzel Farms development, we are <br />faced with a slightly higher percentage. The difference is $200.00 <br />per unit. This might help to supply the higher % of land needs <br />within the range standards. Again, for a neighborhood park the <br />standard was a minimum of 5 acres and optimally between 14 and 17 <br />acres, servicing each 1000 people with between 2.5 to 3.5 developed <br />acres. <br />In all of the single family examples , the ultimate result was to <br />recover enough money to buy park land at the market value. This was <br />the reason for investigating a new approach in the first place. <br />The legal basis for park land dedication is Minnesota State Statute <br />462.358, Subdivision 2(b). It gives cities the legal authority to <br />acquire "reasonable" proportion of land per subdivision to be used <br />for park purposes. The ordinance also addresses cash equivalents. <br />The Minnesota State Statute stems from a 1971 landmark case of <br />Associated Builders of Greater East Bay, Inc. vs. The City of <br />Walnut Creek, California. This case trial did not address <br />commercial/industrial land dedication requirements. This subject <br />has surfaced recently. There are few models to go by and this one <br />n might be challenged. The City of Vadnais Heights recently adopted <br />an ordinance for commercial/industrial that is basically based on <br />building "footprint" sizes. We have used their model and it is <br />included in the proposed ordinance amendment. I submit a new <br />amended ordinance based on the above information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.