Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2 - Assessment of Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Needs <br />• 82.2% indicated that the state should purchase <br />abandoned railroad lines for hiking, biking, and <br />snowmobile trails. <br />• 56.0% indicated that the outdoor recreation <br />facilities built by the State are becoming run <br />down. <br />• 82.6% indicated that the State or Federal <br />Government should spend more money on the <br />overall management of the SL Croix, Minnesota, <br />and Mississippi Rivers in the metro area. <br />• 37.8% indicated that local units of government <br />should take the lead in dealing with natural <br />resource matters in the Twin Cities Metropolitan <br />area. (18.7% Regional, 42.1% State) <br />Community Survey <br />In 1988 a community survey was undertaken by Lee <br />Mehrkens Management Consultants to determine <br />residents' attitude about the community on quite a <br />number of issues, including parks and recreation. <br />It is not our intention to reiterate all of the findings <br />that the survey generated about the community. <br />Instead, it is our intention to look specifically at the <br />issues that are likely to have a direct impact on the <br />development of the park system. However, <br />interested readers are encouraged to obtain a copy <br />of the survey results (available at City Hall) to <br />enhance their understanding of the communities <br />attitude on a wider variety of issues. <br />The results of the survey provide a statistically <br />reliable information base about the residents' <br />attitudes and perceptions toward the community as <br />well as parks and recreation. <br />Survey Summary: <br />CI <br />the five most hiahly desired additions to park <br />facilities and activities (within 1- 5 years) were: <br />1) hiking/walking/jogging trails. <br />2) bicycling trails. <br />3) youth recreation program. <br />4) teen recreation programs. <br />5) restrooms in parks. <br />the five least desired additions to park facilities <br />and activities (within 1 - 5 years) were: <br />1) indoor ice arena. <br />2) outdoor swimming pool. <br />3) indoor swimming pool <br />4) snowmobile trails. <br />5) exercise courses. <br />• the results indicate that a majority of residents <br />(50% or more) desire trails, recreation <br />programs, and restrooms in parks to be <br />improved or developed within 1 - 5 years. <br />• nearly one-third of the residents reported that <br />they never want an indoor ice arena or <br />indoor/outdoor swimming pool to be developed <br />in Lino Lakes. <br />• opinions were split on the need for a park <br />improvement tax increase. Approximately half of <br />the respondents did not support a tax increase <br />for this purpose, while the other half did support <br />some type of increase. <br />• forty-six percent of the respondents did not <br />support any tax increase. However, another <br />forty-six percent did support some type of <br />increase, ranging from $10.00 to $40.00 per year. <br />• by one of the largest majorities found in this <br />survey (65%), residents overwhelmingly <br />responded that recreation programs should be <br />funded through user fees. Twenty-one percent <br />believed that recreation programs should be <br />financed by both property taxes and user fees. <br />Only 1% indicated that recreation programs <br />should be paid for by property taxes. <br />I <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />topping the list of the best things about Lino <br />Lakes were natural open spaces, small town, <br />rural atmosphere, people, peace and quiet, trees <br />and wildlife, and good location within metro <br />area. <br />Figure 6. City Park and Recreation Facilities and <br />Activities Ratings illustrates the rating of various <br />park facilities and activities. <br />Park System Planning <br />Advisory Committee <br />One of the Park System Planning Advisory <br />Committee's primary responsibilities in this planning <br />exercise is to help define the many issues which are <br />pertinent to the future development of the park <br />system. Very early on in the planning process the <br />Committee participated in a number of focus <br />meetings for this purpose. <br />The Committee's input during these meetings was <br />valuable for a couple of reasons. <br />First, it allowed for an opportunity to review and <br />more clearly define the issues brought out by some <br />of the other sources previously highlighted. <br />Secondly, it provided for an opportunity to discuss <br />and define relevant issues within a more singular <br />parks and recreation context. <br />In addition to the issues that have already been <br />addressed in this section, the Park System Planning <br />Advisory Committee brought out a number of key <br />issues and concerns which will undoubtedly impact <br />many aspects of this planning effort. <br />Park System Advisory Committee Statements: <br />• Provide (in a cost effective manner --, possible) <br />