Laserfiche WebLink
Fees and Charges <br />A Legitimate Source of Revenue <br />We are experiencing a park renaissance, which, is directed properly, will <br />result in more and better public services that have ever existed. To accom- <br />plish this we must continue to evaluate and modify many of our traditional <br />operating policies, practices, and procedures. We have now come to a <br />semi -awareness not only of our opportunities, but also of our obligations <br />with respect to sources of revenue in public parks and recreation areas. <br />Indicative of this awareness, this change in thinking, is the attention given <br />on a national scale to fees and charges to provide additional means for <br />operating and maintaining recreational facilities and programs. <br />A system of fees and charges would more nearly assess on an equal basis <br />the people who enjoy the facilities. This does not mean that every man, <br />woman, and child who enters the park must pay an entrance fee. Certainly, <br />no one advocates the fee -and -charge system as the only method of financing <br />operation and maintenance costs, but everyone wants to make facilities <br />available to the largest number possible. This desire can become a reality <br />through the assistance of a well -planned, equitable, program of revenue <br />producing activities. <br />All of us have read on innumerable occasions, that, "Participants appreciate <br />those activities for which they are expected to pay, much more than those <br />which are offered without charge," People feel more responsible toward an <br />activity or a privilege if scme direct cost is involved. A token fee or small <br />charge distinguishes the special activity from the park, per se. As a result <br />of this additional appreciation, it is often easier to control the discipline of <br />the patron or participant. <br />Many of those who object to fees and charges for recreational activities in <br />public parks contend that public properties are provided by taxation and the <br />patron should not be "taxed" again in the form of a fee for the privilege of <br />use. If this is true, then we should abolish all public fees which might be <br />classed in this category: the parking meter - a charge to keep your car on <br />a public street; the toll bridge - a charge to use a public bridge; the toll road- <br />• charge to use a public road; the hunting license - a charge to hunt on public <br />land; the fishing license - a charge to fish in public waters, etc. These user <br />fees provide a means of keeping taxes down. <br />The argument has been advanced from time to time that if a park or recreation <br />agency imposes a fee or a charge for a_:y of its activities, that agency loses <br />its government immunity with respect to _public liability. This is not true... <br />The argument has been advanced from time to time that if a park or re <br />