My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/01/1991 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1991 Park Board Packets
>
04/01/1991 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2021 9:58:51 AM
Creation date
7/23/2021 3:11:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
04/01/1991
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Highway access: We have discussed the access onto r.ake Drive with <br />both the County Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation_ As originally discussed MNOOT prefers to see a <br />maximum of two access points in accordance with the two original <br />field access driveways. How the tfirn lanes and bypass lanes are to <br />be designed is covered under their permit. process. The most <br />northerly portion of the private drive will terminate in a evil de <br />sac conforming to the city engineering standards. <br />Townhouse locations: We do not anticipate moving the locations of <br />the townhomes from the positions shown on the preliminary plat <br />given that we need to have the pads graded at the same time as the <br />rough grading. This is dive to the requirement to have a soil <br />engineer inspect the soil below each pad prior to fill placement <br />in order to receive F.H.A. approval„ <br />Townhouse design and design integration: The specific floor plans <br />may change slightly to meet the market at the time of development <br />but the materials, colors, quality, and size will not. For details <br />on what we are proposing for a floor plan, please refer to the <br />copies previously submitted. These plans indicate the layout of <br />the proposed units and have alternate plans that can be installed <br />intermittently for a greater variety and to allow greater <br />flexibility in meeting the buyers needs. As drawn, the plans do <br />not require great changes in the floor dimensions to allow a <br />varied number of internal configurations. <br />The plans submitted show a streetscape that is not excessively <br />crowded and does not create a walled effect. This is due to the <br />variety of impositions into the line of sight caused by the <br />jutting vestibules of several of the models in each set of <br />units.With the landscaping shown on the landscape plan for each <br />unit as well as that shown on the overall plan, we anticipate the <br />curbside appeal for this project to surpass the typical single <br />family development. <br />Because we are required to constr.ttct upward rather than down due <br />,.� to the high water table, we must build the townhomes as slab on <br />grade units. We do not foresee split level units given their <br />awkwardness for the elderly. We expect to market the product shown <br />or something very similar to it. <br />The concept plan indicates two story units with alternative units <br />available. Such a plan avoids a repitition that wottld become <br />boring. All units shall have aluminum siding anti soffits for <br />maintenance purposes. If brick is used on a particiilar unit, the <br />design will carry through to other units in the project to <br />maintain an integrated effect. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.