My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-04-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
11-04-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 1:52:36 PM
Creation date
11/5/2013 11:03:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/04/2013
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Executive Summary <br />1 <br />1. Executive Summary <br />This report was prepared to review the financial performance of <br />LakesÓ current Water and Sewer Funds and determine the appropriate rate <br />structure, availability charges, and other revenue needed to adequately fund <br />operations through 2022. The process included a historical review of the two <br />utility funds, the evaluation of the appropriate rate structures <br />these operations over the planning period, alternative water rate structures to <br />encourage water demand reduction, connection fees, and a compari <br />with other similar utilities. <br />One major consideration in determining the water rates is compliance with <br />Minnesota State Statutes, Section 103G.291. In the 2012 the Min <br />Legislature redefined the water conservation requirements now calling them <br />demand reduction measures. The law now states that Ðpublic water suppliers <br />serving more than 1,000 people must encourage water conservation <br />employing water use demand reduction measuresÑ as opposed to the initial law <br />requiring Ða conservation rate structureÑ. The law goes on furt <br />ÐDemand reduction measures must include a conservation rate structure, or a <br />uniform rate structure with a conservation program that achieves <br />reduction.Ñ It is important to point out that conservation <br />themselves do not constitute an effective water conservation/demand reduction <br />program. Rate structures work best when coupled with a comprehe <br />program. A water demand reduction program should include, at a minimum, a <br />public education program and public assistance program to achieve the <br />reduction in per capita water use envisioned by the City. <br /> <br />In determining the water rates and rate structure options, Springsted reviewed <br />historical water consumption patterns and used this information to recommend <br />alternative rate structures that would promote water conservatio <br /> <br />All recommendations are based on information provided to us and on the <br />assumptions given for the financial projections. The City will need to monitor <br />the performance of each fund and make any necessary adjustments based upon <br />its actual performance and on the actual construction costs of t <br />capital improvements. <br />The following conclusions were determined as a result of this study and the <br />financial projections prepared: <br />1.The Water and Sewer FundÓs history shows revenues and expenditures, <br />have remained fairly stable over time. Operating income in the Water <br />Fund is projected to decrease from $324,865 in 2009 to $217,713 <br />2012. Operating income in the Sewer Fund is projected to declin <br />rapidly from $70,057 in 2009 to ($56,275) in 2012, thereby not f <br />depreciation. <br />2.The City should maintain a minimum cash balance in each Utility fund of <br />at least three months of anticipated operating expenses and one <br />debt service at the end of each year. Current and projected cash levels <br />support this recommendation. <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota – Water and Sewer Rate Study Update <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.