09/11/1995 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Section is-imptemenuutun t iva Figure&4(Part 2 of 2). Priority Ranidng Matrix- Park Land Development Prioritizing Key. o a Q High Priority/Concern o Z Q Moderate Priority/Concern u ❑ Low Priority/concern ° a Priodty Ranting Sak:1 through- (1 Being Most Important) n b n p4 • a �o Park Site Park Type Park Acreage Est.Dev.Cast Exist. Future Total N-13(Brandywood Park) Neighborhood Park 5.0 Aix 3.0 Ac. 8.0 Ac. $190,000 4 N-14 Neighborhood Park None 6.0 Ac. 6.0 Aix $180,000 O 1 1 11 N-15 Neighborhood Park None 10.0 Ac. 10.0 Ac. $295,000 28 C-1(Country Lakes Park) Community Park 22.0 Aix 9.0 Ac. 31.0 Ac. $625,000-$825,000 0 7 C-2 Community Park None 36.0 Ac. 36.0 Ac. $1.5-$2.0 Mil. 27 A-1 Athletic Complex 27.0 Aix 33.0 Ac. 60.0 Aix $2.3-$3.0 Mil. O O 01 1 12 A-2 Youth Athletic Fields(W/Neighborhood Park) 20.0 Ac. None 20.0 Ac. $400,000-$600,000 O O 13 A-3 Athletic Complex None 50.0 50.0 Ac. 82S-$3.2 Mil. 30 JU-1(Lino Lakes Elem.) Youth Athletic Fields and Neighborhood Park 20.0 None 20.0 Ac. $150,000-$210,000 O 20 JU-2(Birch Street Elem.) Youth Athletic Fields 15A None 15.0 Ac. $135,000-$195,000 10 JU-3(Cent.School Dist.) Neighborhood Park 10.0 None 10.0 Ac. $180,000 O 14 JU4(Rice Creek Paris) Neighborhood Park 10.0 None 10.0 Ac. N/A 29 Rice Creek Park Regional Park Reserve 2500+Aix None 2500+Ac. N A N/ ' Actual acquisition and development costs will depend upon:a)the actual land values at the time of acquisition;b)the actual program for development at the time of development based on community and neighborhood input;c)site specific physical characteristics(such as grades,so4 availability of utilities, etc.)affecting the development of each pack;c) the actual construction oasts at the time of development;and d)what portion of the costs can be offset through alternative funding program volunteerism,grants,donations,eta The cost estimates as shown an based on:a)estimated land values (in 1992 dollars)as determined by the city,and b)typical development costs(in 1992 dollars)as determined by industry cost-to-construct averages for parks of similar sine and scope.The cost estimate for each park is based on that parles optimal level of development and therefore do not reflect the affect that funding limitations may have on their development.Also,the cad estimates are based on each park's current condition and does not consider the cods associated with replacing existing facilities and amenities that are currently in reasonable shape but may"wrar-out'in the forthcoming years.These costs should be factored in as appropriate when the cod estimates for each park are updated in the future. 8-10