My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/22/1995 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1995 Park Board Packets
>
02/22/1995 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 12:53:02 PM
Creation date
8/6/2021 10:15:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/22/1995
Park Bd Meeting Type
Joint
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Purchasing Options <br /> Athletic Complex <br /> Total acres: 82.50 <br /> Sewer District 5 <br /> Background <br /> Appraisal Completed January 11, 1995 <br /> Two approaches were taken: Market Data Approach <br /> Subdivision Approach <br /> Market Data looked at a survey of sales of land in Lino Lakes. <br /> Adjustments were made for factors such as location, availability <br /> of utilities, topography, and time of sales. <br /> Subdivision Development attempts to look at the subject property <br /> from the perspective of a potential developer on the site. The <br /> value is indicated by estimating the total revenue that the site <br /> will generate upon development. An assumption was made here that <br /> a developer would require a 20 % return on sales in order to be <br /> motivated to assuming the risks associated with development. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> Market Data Approach Value: $250,000 or $3000 per acre. <br /> Subdivision Approach Value: $350,000 or $3900 per acre. <br /> Property owners perception of land value based on what developers <br /> have indicated land is worth: $12,000 per acre. <br /> Allen company indicated that the only way that a developer would <br /> pay this fee for the land would be on a contingency contract <br /> based on sewer and water availability. <br /> Sewer and water availability are 5-7 years away. <br /> Property owners do not need the money and are willing to wait. <br /> Options: <br /> Cannot pay more then the appraised market value , or a negotiated <br /> compromise on this, based on council directive. <br /> Bond Referendum; however bond proceeds to finance project costs <br /> usually have to be spent within 3 years from the date of <br /> issuance. The thought here was to use bond proceeds or other <br /> available city monies to invest in a interest bearing account to <br /> reach an acceptable land value to the property owners at the end <br /> r of a seven year period. <br /> Contract for deed; one-fifth down, where there is a five year <br /> payment schedule, interest is paid. on the unpaid balance at 6% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.