My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/11/2021 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2021
>
08/11/2021 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2021 11:20:32 AM
Creation date
8/6/2021 10:18:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
08/11/2021
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> <br />1. Eliminated the PUD by conditional use permit and requires them all to be done as a <br />rezoning to the PUD zoning district. The rezoning to PUD creates a negotiated zoning <br />district unique to the individual project and gives the City a higher level of discretion <br />than a conditional use permit. The City has used this tool for mixed use projects like: <br /> <br />a. Lyngblomsten where PUD flexibility allowed reduced structure setbacks along <br />CSAH 49 and CR J (as envisioned by the Hodgson Road & County Road J <br />Master Planning Study) in exchange for implementing the City’s Master Plan, <br />redeveloping a blighted 20-acre site, and increasing buffers and separation from <br />adjacent neighborhoods. <br /> <br />b. Nature’s Refuge where PUD flexibility was granted for reduced right-of-way <br />width, reduced front structure setbacks and reduced pavement width in exchange <br />for minimizing impacts to rare and endangered species and wetlands and <br />protections of 60% open space and wetlands. <br /> <br />c. Watermark where PUD flexibility was granted from lot width/size standards and <br />building design standards in exchange for upholding the City’s public values by <br />creating a multi-functional open space greenway corridor integrated with the <br />stormwater conveyance system, wetland management and trails when none exists <br />today; providing life-cycle housing opportunities, creating a master planned <br />community from 12 separate parcels, and creating a high amenity built <br />environment. <br /> <br />2. Modifying the purpose and intent to be clearer and more concise. <br /> <br />3. Expanding the list of desired public benefits to be evaluated with PUDs. <br /> <br />4. Creating a table to identify base development guidelines by zoning district along with a <br />reference to the base general provision standards. While staff historically has included <br />this base zoning reference as part of the analysis and noted this district in the staff report, <br />this change will provide more clarity. <br /> <br />5. Deleting unnecessary general requirements covered under other sections of the Zoning or <br />Subdivision Ordinance. <br /> <br />6. Moving Rural Residential PUD requirements to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow it by <br />right. These subdivisions will allow clustering of homes on smaller lots than would <br />typically be allowed in exchange for preservation of at least 50% of the area as open <br />space and compliance with additional conservation development standards. <br /> <br />7. Modifying the open space performance standards to clarify how it is calculated and <br />designed in urban residential PUDs. <br /> <br />8. Creating a subsection for mixed-use PUD requirements which references the residential, <br />commercial, and industrial PUD sections.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.