Laserfiche WebLink
The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to the property. The <br /> property is not unique when compared to other similar sized rural properties with similar <br /> uses and large accessory structures. The landowner is allowed to operate a commercial <br /> stable in accordance to Resolution No. 21-67. The landowner purchased the property <br /> under the false assumption they could have an unlimited number of animal units. <br /> 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> The variance will alter the essential character of the locality which is a single family <br /> home, riding stable and arena in a rural residential neighborhood. The number of <br /> allowed animal units has already been doubled from 12.5 to 25.0 with the approved <br /> conditional use permit. The magnitude of quadrupling the number of animal units from <br /> 12.5 to 50 alters the essential character of the locality. <br /> 6.A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for <br /> property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. <br /> The variance will not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for <br /> property in the zoning district. The property is zoned R, Rural and commercial stable is <br /> allowed with an approved conditional use permit. <br /> 7. In accordance with MN Stat. 462.357, Subp. 6,variances shall be granted for earth <br /> sheltered construction as defined in MN Stat. 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with <br /> the zoning ordinance. <br /> Not applicable. <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby <br /> denies the variance request to double the number of allowed animal units from 25.0 to <br /> 50.0 on the Property. <br /> Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of August, 2021. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by <br /> Councilmember Stoesz and was duly seconded by Councilmember Cavegn and upon vote <br /> being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Cavegn, Stoesz, Ruhland, <br /> Lyden, Rafferty <br /> The following voted against same:None <br /> Ro Rafferty, Mayor <br /> ATTEST: <br /> '� Julian Bartell, City Jerk <br /> 5 <br />