Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 11, 2021 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Laden agreed with Chair Tralle’s comment to have the Planning & Zoning Board <br />invited to the neighborhood meetings since they represent the citizens of Lino Lakes. <br />Chair Tralle commented it is important for the Board to attend the meetings simply to <br />observe the conversation between the developer and the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Grochala said we can make sure the Board members are invited to the meetings. <br />However, he cautioned the Board not to get drawn into the conversation. <br /> <br />Mr. Wipperfurth appreciated Mr. Grochala’s explanation as to why the neighborhood <br />meeting should occur at the concept stage and he agreed. He reiterated it would be <br />more difficult for a developer to make changes to the development after plans are <br />drawn and money is invested. <br /> <br />Mr. Grochala then changed the conversation to address rural cluster developments. <br />He said there are a few permanent rural areas in the City that will never receive City <br />sewer and water specifically between Rondeau Lake Rd and 35W and a corner <br />section in the southeast quad of the City. In these areas, the City is considering <br />letting owners subdivide at a higher density to allow for cluster developments; <br />however, 50% of the land would need to be preserved as permanent open or <br />agricultural space. The lot sizes would be a minimum of two acres with a community <br />drain field. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden stated it would be helpful to see a map of the permanent rural areas <br />throughout the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen commented there are few permanent rural areas that will never receive <br />City sewer and water. <br /> <br />Mr. Evenson asked if the zoning ordinance specifies permanent rural. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden agreed and questioned if it is clear the ordinance is referencing permanent <br />rural areas and not areas current zoned rural. <br /> <br />Ms. Lindahl said it should have been more clear in the staff report, but the language <br />in the draft is specific. She commented a map of the permanent rural areas will be <br />included. <br /> <br />Mr. Grochala explained City staff also discussed allowing cluster developments in the <br />post 2040, urban reserve areas; however, the 50% open space requirement would be <br />temporary. He said this idea is not currently proposed as it could create unintended <br />consequences. <br /> <br />Ms. Lindahl reiterated in the permanent rural areas, the cluster developments would <br />maintain a 50% permanent open space. If proposed, in the urban reserve areas, open <br />space would be protected until municipal sewer and water arrives. <br />