My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-23-2021 Council Minutes (3)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2021
>
08-23-2021 Council Minutes (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2021 1:21:10 PM
Creation date
9/16/2021 3:20:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
08/23/2021
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />APPROVED <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE August 23, 2021 <br />5 TIME STARTED 5*58 p.m. <br />6 TIME ENDED 6:26 p.m. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT Councilmember Stoesz, Lyden, <br />8 Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT Councilmember Ruhland <br />to Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Finance Director Hannah <br />11 Lynch; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Engineer Diane <br />12 Hankee; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />13 <br />14 1. (5:00 p.m.) Closed Session —Pending litigation regarding St. Clair Estates <br />15 (see separate minutes) <br />16 2. Lyngblomsten Development Update —Community Development Director <br />17 Grochala updated the council on the status of the development, including assistance that <br />18 was planned from the City. The development contract needs to be updated since it is two <br />19 years old and while that is more of an administrative process, the developer is now <br />20 requesting additional assistance in the amount of $500,000. Staff has looked at the <br />21 available budget in the tax increment district and feels the City can go up to $400,000 <br />22 without having to modify the district. Anything over that amount would necessitate a <br />23 modification to the district as it is currently established and a process that would extend a <br />24 couple of months. Staff has provided the suggestion of $400,000 to the developer and <br />25 they are still asking if the City would be able to provide the remainder of the requesting <br />26 assistance ($100,000) in any other way. Mr. Grochala noted that this will be coming to <br />27 the council (Economic Development Authority) as soon as the council deems possible. <br />28 <br />29 Councilmember Cavegn asked when the project was supposed to be completed and staff <br />3o said they were shooting for fall of 2019 for the start, however, the pandemic shut down <br />31 industry. Councilmember Cavegn asked if there is an additional funding possibility <br />32 they'd recommend. Mr. Grochala noted that the $400,000 is available through TIF but <br />33 above that he would probably have to look at roadway funding in conjunction with <br />34 improvements that will be occurring in the area. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Stoesz remarked that there was discussion about the payback period and <br />37 wonders where that discussion stands. Community Development Director Grochala <br />38 updated the council on that schedule. Councilmember Stoesz asked if extending the TIF <br />39 timeframe would provide the additional funds and Mr. Grochala said yes, but that would <br />40 push the project ahead another year because an amendment process would be required. <br />41 <br />42 Councilmember Lyden asked how much assistance was planned and Mr. Grochala said <br />43 $3.6 million; they are requesting an additional $500,000. When asked about the total <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.