My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/08/2021 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
09/08/2021 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2021 9:45:11 AM
Creation date
10/14/2021 9:44:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/2021
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />September 8, 2021 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />recommended revising the zoning ordinance to include specific details about where <br />the City would like to have mini self-storage facilities located and whether the City <br />would like to see single building storage facilities constructed. <br /> <br />Mr. Wipperfurth asked how a large single building storage facility compares in value <br />to a large distribution warehouse such as Distribution Alternatives. He further <br />questioned if the City would want a large single building storage facility built in the <br />same industrial areas as our warehouses. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen clarified mini self-storage facilities can only be constructed in our <br />industrial areas. She said the valuation of a large single building storage facility <br />would not be as high as Distribution Alternatives. <br /> <br />Mr. Wipperfurth said he is in favor of creating a moratorium, discussing mini self- <br />storage facilities further, and revising the zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Reinert commented the City of Lino Lakes has implemented moratoriums before. <br />He said Lino Lakes is thoughtful about development. Since mini self-storage is <br />growing in popularity, he supported creating a moratorium in order to give the City <br />more time to determine how mini self-storage facilities ought to be constructed in <br />Lino Lakes. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden asked Ms. Larsen how long it will take to revise and approve the zoning <br />ordinance to include mini self-storage facilities. He recalled the topic of mini self- <br />storage facilities was brought up two years ago, but no further conversation ensued. <br />He said creating a moratorium is a drastic move and should be a last resort. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen explained since we do not want to change the ordinance multiple times, <br />the goal is to include mini self-storage facilities within the zoning ordinance update. <br />She said it will likely take one (1) year to adopt the zoning ordinance, but if it gets <br />approved by City Council and through the public hearings quickly, then it may be <br />approved sooner. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden wondered since there is demand for mini self-storage facilities now, will <br />the City miss out on development opportunities if a moratorium is created. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen said the developers will return. She stated the City ordinance needs to <br />have more thorough language in place regarding mini self-storage facilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden questioned why the City would not push the mini self-storage facilities <br />ordinance amendment through if there is demand for mini self-storage now. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen explained the City needs time to discuss where the facilities should be <br />constructed, whether in commercial or industrial districts, and what will the <br />conditions be. She stated the City is discussing such topics right now with the zoning
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.