My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-24-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
05-24-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2021 10:53:20 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 9:07:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/24/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 6 <br /> 220 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted there is availability of access so he can use the structure and he sees 221 <br />the hope of change through an ordinance amendment. Having looked at the property and 222 <br />hearing staff, he is not favoring the variance request. 223 <br /> 224 <br />Councilmember Ruhland asked about process. Since the council is strongly discussing 225 <br />an ordinance change, can’t the City say this is in the works so granting the variance 226 <br />makes sense in that light? City Planner Larsen remarked that she wouldn’t recommend 227 <br />circumventing the ordinance amendment process (i.e. public hearing); staff could 228 <br />certainly try and put something together sooner rather than later. 229 <br /> 230 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked if the matter will go forward to council no matter what 231 <br />happens; staff concurred. 232 <br /> 233 <br />The matter will be considered at Monday’s council meeting. Mr. Sadowski thanked the 234 <br />council for their consideration and time spent up to this point. 235 <br />5. Utility Billing Statement Processing – Finance Director Lynch reviewed the 236 <br />written report outlining options staff is presenting to deal with the breakdown of the 237 <br />machine used by City staff for utility billing. She reviewed the recommendation to either 238 <br />outsource the function or purchase new equipment. There is some timing involved since 239 <br />staff is having to utilize Centennial Utilities’ equipment. Ms. Lynch reviewed what was 240 <br />included in the analysis of options. 241 <br /> 242 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted the $1,100+ that was being paid annually for equipment 243 <br />maintenance and he asked why that was required on such a new machine? Ms. Lynch 244 <br />explained why that is normal. Mayor Rafferty asked about the possibility of leasing 245 <br />equipment for a year to see how it works. Ms. Lynch said that is possible. Ms. Lynch 246 <br />provided additional information on the envelopes and statement costs. Mayor Rafferty 247 <br />asked if there is a way to determine when less is needed (people aren’t using a return 248 <br />envelope). The mayor also asked about mailing needs for other departments and 249 <br />received information. 250 <br /> 251 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked what staff is recommending. Ms. Lynch said staff is 252 <br />recommending either purchase or outsourcing. 253 <br /> 254 <br />Councilmember Cavegn said he likes the idea of outsourcing since it saves on equipment 255 <br />repairs and presents some cost savings. 256 <br /> 257 <br />Councilmember Lyden suggested that staff has prepared a good deal of information and 258 <br />he wonders what their bottom line recommendation would be. 259 <br /> 260 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there are rules on non-utility billing staff seeing data and 261 <br />Ms. Lynch said it is all basically public data. On the question of return envelopes and if 262 <br />the City can provide them to only people who use them, it seems to be everyone or no 263
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.