Laserfiche WebLink
Page 49 of 73 <br /> <br />Annual Profit and Loss Statements <br />The P & L budget summaries provide a summary of Years Zero to Five for both Management <br />options. These P & L Statements breakdown the revenue and expenses as follows with detailed <br />categories within each: <br /> Facility Revenue <br /> Program Revenue <br /> Operational Expenses <br /> Program Expenses <br /> City Administration Allocation <br /> Annual allocation to Long Term Capital Replacement Reserve <br /> <br />The P & L Statements calculate the annual Net Revenue (Deficit) and the percentage Cost Recovery <br />for both Management options. The Net Revenue (Deficit) calculations calculate the following Net <br />Revenue scenarios: <br /> Net Operating Expenses <br /> Net Operating Expenses with City Administration Allocation included <br /> Net Operating Expenses with City Admin Allocation plus annual Capital Reserve Fund <br />allocation <br /> <br />Following is a summary of the Profit and Loss Summary for Year Two. <br /> <br />Year Two P & L Comparison <br /> <br />Budget Category City Managed <br />Option <br />Hybrid <br />Management <br />Option <br />Variance <br />Facility Revenue $1,767,017 $1,561,440 $(205,577) <br />Program Revenue $406,157 $186,162 $(219,995) <br />TOTAL REVENUE $2,173,174 $1,747,602 $(425,572) <br />Operational Expenses $1,952,592 $1,617,475 $335,117 <br />Program Expenses $191,529 $67,550 $123,979 <br />City Admin Share Allocation $157,500 $157,500 $0 <br />*TOTAL EXPENSES $2,301,621 $1,842,525 $459,096 <br /> <br />NET REVENUE (DEFICIT) $(128,447) $(94,923) $33,524 <br />Cost Recovery 94% 95% <br /> <br />*NOTE: Total Expenses do not include annual Long Term Reserve Allocation. <br /> <br />Accrued Net Operating Revenue (Deficit) <br />The P & L Statements also show the accrued Deficit for the Rec Center from Year Zero through <br />Year Five. The accrued Deficit is where the biggest variance between the City Managed and <br />Hybrid Management Model exists. The accrued Deficit for the Hybrid Management Model is <br />significantly less than the City Management Model based on the much lower up front re-opening <br />costs and the faster ramp up of membership and program revenue. <br />