My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-28-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
06-28-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2021 10:53:20 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 9:08:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/28/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 5 <br />by the pandemic regulations. The waiver of license fees for the coming license period is 181 <br />proposed. 182 <br /> 183 <br />The council concurred that they would support an action waiving the fees. 184 <br /> 185 <br />5. Water Treatment Plant Update – Community Development Director Grochala 186 <br />reported. It’s been almost a year since the council received the result of a feasibility 187 <br />study on this matter. Council wanted to look at rates and a pilot study of treatment 188 <br />results. Staff is asking if they should proceed with that pilot study (over four months). 189 <br />The cost of doing a study was noted and a possible funding source would be Area and 190 <br />Unit Fund. 191 <br /> 192 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if the test would include other things besides manganese; 193 <br />Director Grochala said it would include identified potential issue chemicals. 194 <br /> 195 <br />Councilmember Ruhland asked if all wells would be included in a pilot test and Mr. 196 <br />Grochala said it would be done only for the well seen as the worst. Councilmember 197 <br />Ruhland asked how long the reports would be viable and Mr. Grochala estimated it would 198 <br />be good for a couple years but he will confirm that estimate. 199 <br /> 200 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there will be a tour opportunity for the trailer. Mr. 201 <br />Grochala suggested that the trailer wouldn’t be a good example of a water treatment 202 <br />facility and if the City choses a treatment facility it will be individually designed. Mayor 203 <br />Rafferty said the council can tour another water treatment facility if they wish. 204 <br /> 205 <br />Councilmember Ruhland noted that he wants to make sure the schedule for developing a 206 <br />water treatment facility (if that were the council’s decision) wouldn’t make a pilot study 207 <br />inaccurate. 208 <br /> 209 <br />The council concurred that staff should get the answers and then add the matter to the 210 <br />council’s action agenda. The council concurred that it can be put on the next agenda. 211 <br /> 212 <br />6. Environmental Board Openings – Administrator Cotton reviewed the written 213 <br />staff report. There are currently two openings (one in July) on the Environmental Board, 214 <br />both due to resignations. There are three applicants from the last open appointments 215 <br />period. Staff would like council direction on proceeding with filling the vacancies. 216 <br /> 217 <br />Mayor Rafferty suggested that the process be opened again. The three applicants will be 218 <br />notified. The City will accept applications through the end of July. 219 <br /> 220 <br />7. Council Compensation – Administrator Cotton reviewed the written staff report. 221 <br />This would be an appropriate time to consider council compensation, to be effective 222 <br />2022. She has recommended an increase based on the wage adjustments provided to 223 <br />staff. Staff is recommending that the matter be placed on the June 14th council agenda. 224
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.