My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-12-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
07-12-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2021 11:21:35 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 11:08:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/12/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />2 <br />G) Consider Resolution No. 21-66, Approving Common Interest 41 <br />Agreement, DNR Water Appropriation Permit Amendment 42 <br />Appeal Approved 43 <br />FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 44 <br />There was no report from the Finance Department. 45 <br />ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 46 <br />3A) Consider Resolution No 21-62, Accepting Recreation and Aquatics Center Feasibility 47 <br />Study, ISG – Community Development Director Grochala reviewed his written report. It’s been 48 <br />about a year since the City was notified that the YMCA would not be reopening the facility in Lino 49 <br />Lakes. The City commissioned a feasiblity study and the consultants who have prepared that report 50 <br />are present. 51 <br /> 52 <br />Mr. Stu Isaac, Isaac Sport Group, reviewed the written report, summarized in a presentation including 53 <br />information on : 54 <br />- The Study Process and Methodology; 55 <br />- Goals and Opportunities for the Rec Center; 56 <br />- Vision - rethinking as a Lino Lakes Recreation and Community Center to include those things 57 <br />that were missing from the YMCA offerings; 58 <br />- Programming (precedes design) – Immediate and long term growth and expansion; 59 <br />- Potential Program Outsourcing (swim lessons; fitness provider); 60 <br />- Membership Model – recommending 60% of equivalent YMCA membership rates; overall and 61 <br />drop in memberships; membership categories; discount for annual membership; 62 <br />- Operating and Financial Goals; 63 <br />- Management Models (City managed; Outsourced; Hybrid management model); pros and cons 64 <br />of each reviewed; 65 <br />- Re-Opening Costs – estimate provided; 66 <br />- Financial Operating Analysis (City managed and hybrid option); (Year 3 budget estimate); 67 <br />- Long Term Accrued Deficit; 68 <br />- Capital Outlay; 69 <br />- Long Term Goals and Opportunities (sports center, outdoor activity center, community 70 <br />function space); 71 <br />- Timeline – workback provided in report for hybrid and city managed model; timeline factors; 72 <br />- Next steps. 73 <br />Delores Langston, 6625 White Birch Court – She and her hustand are charter members of the YMCA 74 <br />and they mourn it’s passing. Seniors used the facility to get together. They hope that when this does 75 <br />reopen, that opportunity will continue. She’d be less excited if it were to be outscourced. 76
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.