My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09-13-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
09-13-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2021 11:21:36 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 11:09:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/13/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />- Duty crew – concern about having a revolving door; 90 <br /> 91 <br />He asked if the Public Safety Department has come up with the plan for half the units for 92 <br />a duty crew? 93 <br /> 94 <br />Public Safety Director Swenson concurred that there is turnover risk with park time staff 95 <br />(Fire duty crew) but they are trying to keep costs down. The number of part time staff 96 <br />proposed is based on the research they’ve done and based on the lowest possible cost. 97 <br />Mayor Rafferty asked if there is a way to be transitional while still meeting the goals; 98 <br />there is something that needs to be accomplished and he’s committed to it. Public Safety 99 <br />Director Swenson explained the need in the police division to have resources; the time to 100 <br />respond to low level calls is growing. When the mayor asked about adding fire personnel 101 <br />through police hiring, Director Swenson explained the history of bringing forward the 102 <br />duty crew idea after much work by the department and with the idea that there could be a 103 <br />situation where public safety is under resourced. 104 <br /> 105 <br />Councilmember Lyden noted that the Public Safety Director is consistently giving the 106 <br />council the information needed to understand how to provide adequate public safety 107 <br />services. 108 <br /> 109 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if the council will decide on a tax rate that is acceptable. 110 <br /> 111 <br />The mayor remarked that he is not comfortable with the current number. 112 <br /> 113 <br />Councilmember Lyden said he’d be happy with a flat tax rate but he isn’t sure it’s 114 <br />realistic; he’d like to see what a flat tax would look like. 115 <br /> 116 <br />Councilmember Stoesz noted that he’s been looking at basically the same budget for all 117 <br />the years he’s served on the council. He struggles with what to cut and has great respect 118 <br />for public safety. 119 <br /> 120 <br />Administrator Cotton remarked that there have been a few cuts noted and she has 121 <br />quantified that to a reduction $106,500 and that would result in a tax rate of 41.966 ($157 122 <br />tax increase to $300,000 home with $96 of that being valuation increase). She added that 123 <br />staff has reviewed how American Rescue Act funds could impact the budget and have not 124 <br />found additional areas (beyond negative impacts of COVID) but some of the surplus 125 <br />funds that will be available in the City budget are probably related to CARES funds. 126 <br /> 127 <br />The council received an update on the Watermark development and when that tax 128 <br />valuation will be included on the City’s tax rolls. 129 <br /> 130 <br />Mayor Rafferty asked what it would take to get down to last year’s rate (40.109) or 41.0. 131 <br />Roughly $350,000 to get to 41.0. 132 <br /> 133
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.