Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br /> 89 <br />The council directed staff to prepare a resolution (on increasing the benefit) and work on 90 <br />formalizing an allocation plan (on reimbursement), both to be considered for formal 91 <br />council action. 92 <br /> 93 <br />2. Huntson Addition Concept Plan – (Councilmember Ruhland moved to sit in the 94 <br />audience). City Planner Larsen noted that what the council is seeing is strictly a concept 95 <br />plan - a general overview and high level conversation to inform the property owners, 96 <br />Mike Ruhland and his wife. The property in question is located at 6941 Ware Road and 97 <br />is a four acre parcel that the owners wish to divide to develop one six unit townhome 98 <br />building and one two unit building. 99 <br /> 100 <br />Ms. Larsen reviewed a PowerPoint that included information on the following: 101 <br />- Aerial Map; 102 <br />- 2040 Future Land Use Plan (different MDRs); 103 <br />- Density chart – how many units does a four acre parcel have to take on; the 104 <br />proposal includes nine units which puts the proposal within range, with the understanding 105 <br />that wetlands and roadway would have an impact; 106 <br />- Property is currently zoned rural; future zoning changes would be required; 107 <br />- For a PUD, public benefit should be determined; 108 <br />- Split site plan for two parcels; 109 <br />- Oak Hollow Street – one side would be six townhomes and other side a two unit 110 <br />structure; 111 <br />- Square footage base lots are required for both developments and the sites do not 112 <br />meet those requirements; 113 <br />- Wetlands on properties noted; 114 <br />- Staff comments (review of preliminary findings); 115 <br />- Preliminary design standards noted; 116 <br />- Utilities would be required; 117 <br />- Advisory Board comments reviewed. 118 <br /> 119 <br />Ms. Larsen noted that staff is requesting general feedback from the council. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Councilmember Cavegn noted concern about proposed lot size and garage width. He 122 <br />asked if the applicant would consider twin homes rather than townhomes. 123 <br /> 124 <br />Applicant Mike Ruhland noted that he attended the (area) housing association meeting 125 <br />and, considering their feedback, he is feeling now that he may want to make some 126 <br />changes to the proposal. 127 <br /> 128 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if there is any concern about storm water drainage; City 129 <br />Planner Larsen remarked that each development is required to have a plan. 130 <br /> 131 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked about the property to the west; Ms. Larsen said there is a 132 <br />single family house there. Councilmember Lyden noted the single family housing that 133