My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-23-2020 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2020
>
03-23-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2021 12:29:26 PM
Creation date
11/17/2021 11:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/23/2020
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />5. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the <br />structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed <br />subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. <br /> <br />6. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement <br />Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed <br />improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br /> <br />7. The LOS requirements in paragraphs 1. to 4. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, <br />interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and <br />the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to <br />determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must <br />determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic <br />contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The <br />plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and <br />cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to <br />traffic at the interchange. <br /> <br />8. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br /> <br />The traffic generated by the existing retail business and proposed restaurant are within <br />the capabilities of the streets serving the property and meet LOS requirements. The City <br />will not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br /> <br />(e) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. <br /> <br />The existing retail business and proposed restaurant will be served with adequate and <br />safe water supply. <br /> <br />(f) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate or safe sanitary sewer <br />system. <br /> <br />The existing retail business and proposed restaurant will be served with adequate and <br />safe sanitary sewer. <br /> <br />(g) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City <br />funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />No City funds are being expended for this development. <br /> <br />(h) Development shall be permitted only in such a manner that the maximum number of <br />trees shall be preserved. It shall be the duty of the person seeking approval to <br />demonstrate that there are no feasible or prudent alternatives to the cutting of trees <br />on the site.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.