Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />2 <br />ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 40 <br />A) Consider Adoption of the Pandemic Response Plan – City Administrator Karlson 41 <br />explained that staff is presenting this Plan and requesting council adoption. This document will serve 42 <br />to guide the City through the current emergency and gives the council information on how staff 43 <br />intends to proceed through a process of preparation and response on an escalating basis as needed. 44 <br />He explained that department directors are preparing to escalate if necessary and the council will be 45 <br />kept fully informed moving forward. 46 <br />Councilmember Lyden noted that Anoka County hasn’t provided an update for a few days; he’s 47 <br />curious about those numbers. Public Safety Director Swenson noted that the number of confirmed 48 <br />cases in the county is currently at six. 49 <br />Councilmember Stoesz noted, with the Declaration of Emergency approved by the council last week, 50 <br />he is struggling with also approving this more detailed plan. He pointed out that elected officials are 51 <br />not experts and staff has done a good job in responding to this point. He feels that staff was given 52 <br />authority to proceed with their actions by that declaration. Administrator Karlson responded that 53 <br />policies are generally brought to the council for approval and added that the League of Minnesota is 54 <br />recommending that cities have a plan such as this. Mr. Karlson said it is the council’s choice as to 55 <br />how they will approach adoption of this p lan but staff will proceed to respond. 56 <br />Councilmember Cavagn noted that he recognizes that staff brings policy forward for council 57 <br />consideration and they do so having done the appropriate background work. 58 <br />Councilmember Ruhland said he concurs with Cavegn but also understands the question that has 59 <br />arisen about expertise. 60 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked if how the council should act is a question of legal authority? 61 <br />Administrator Karlson said he hasn’t spoken to the City Attorney on this document specifically but 62 <br />as he has explained, the plan represents recommendations on how staff would intend to proceed; 63 <br />there’s intent to keep the council fully involved in decisions going forward. 64 <br />Councilmember Stoesz said his intent is not to hold up the plan so he will support moving forward 65 <br />with the understanding of his comments. 66 <br />Councilmember Ruhland moved to accept the Plan as presented. Councilmember Cavegn seconded the 67 <br />motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. 68 <br />B) Consider Building Official Salary Increase, Karissa Bartholomew 69 <br /> i. Consider Resolution 20-32 Appointing an Interim Building Official and Approving a 70 <br />Professional Service Contract for Building Official Services. 71 <br />Administrator Karlson reviewed the written staff report. The City’s building official, Patr ick Moonen 72 <br />has submitted his resignation. Mr. Kar lson said that Mr. Moonen is an exceptional employee. He 73 <br />stated that the City’s salary for the building official position is below market and so staff is requesting an 74 <br />increase to that salary. Mr. Karlso n also noted that the City is in the process of conducting a 75 <br />compensation study and he expects that there will be a recommendation to increase the salary as part of 76 <br />that study. His point is that there is a quality individual in a very important and requir ed city position. 77 <br />The staff recommendation is to increase the position salary by $7,000 in the hopes of retaining Mr. 78 <br />Moonen. If Mr. Moonen is not retained, the City will have to look at an outside contract for the 79 <br />building official services. He pointed out the monthly cost of contracting for services is much higher in 80 <br />comparison to the monthly salary of Mr. Moonen. 81