Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DRAFT <br />2 <br />B) Consider Approval of April 6, 2020 45 <br /> Work Session Minutes Approved 46 <br />C) Consider Approval of April 13, 2020 47 <br /> Council Meeting Minutes Approved 48 <br />D) Consider Approval of Noise Ordinance Signage Approved 49 <br />E) Consider Approval of Resolution No. 20-37, Approving 50 <br />a Permit for Consumer Firework Sales at Target 51 <br />Store 1448 Approved 52 <br />FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 53 <br />2A) Consider Resolution No. 20-43, Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General 54 <br />Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A, in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount 55 <br />of $4,800,000 – Finance Director Cotton reviewed the written staff report. The recommendation is 56 <br />to move forward with the issuance and sale of bonds to finance the approved water tower project. 57 <br />The bonds will be repaid over a period of 15 years. 58 <br />Mayor Rafferty asked if there are important elements about this project that the council should 59 <br />know. Ms. Cotton noted that the council adopted a resolution some time ago allowing the City to 60 <br />pay for work that is done prior to receiving the bond proceeds; additionally there are measures in 61 <br />place recognizing the current market. 62 <br />Terri Heaton, financial consultant with Baker Tilly, reported. She explained that the resolution 63 <br />authorizes a competitve sale on June 8, 2020 but if the market becomes volitale it allo ws for 64 <br />flexibility. Mayor Rafferty asked if there is something to be cautiously looking at? Ms. Heaton 65 <br />noted that the market has been pretty stable for the last few weeks, barring some volitilty tied to 66 <br />certain types of announcements. 67 <br />Council Member Cavegn asked, if the market does become volitale and bonds aren’t sold, what is in 68 <br />place to pay expenses? Ms. Cotton said expenses would be paid with cash on hand, specifically from 69 <br />the trunk utility fund and she is comfortable that could go on for some time. 70 <br />Ms. Heaton noted that, from the bond side, the flexibility would be needed probably only up to two 71 <br />weeks to a month if a delay is necessary. 72 <br />Council Member Ruhland noted that he’s been watching the market closely. He is wondering if 73 <br />there is any connection to what is occuring in the mor tgage based securities market. Ms. Heaton 74 <br />noted twenty year markets and she feels that is back to stable post pandemic; we are in the early days 75 <br />of pandemic, however, and so there could be changes ahead. 76 <br />Council Member Stoesz asked, if there is a delay in construction due to social distancing, would 77 <br />there be an impact on the bonds? Ms. Heaton explained that the City will have up to three years to 78 <br />spend bond proceeds; past that, you can actually spread it out longer if necessary. 79 <br />Council Member Ruhland asked about the interest rate; Ms. Heaton noted 1.93% for fifteen years. 80 <br />Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-43 as presented. Council Member 81 <br />Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 82 <br />ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT 83