05-26-2020 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES DRAFT 8 - Advisory board review and approval; 285 - Actions requested by the council. 286 Mayor Rafferty noted that he visited the area and he sees great progress and it looks as if it will be a 287 very nice development. 288 Councilmember Stoesz asked if this action will approve both Phase 3A and 3B of the 3rd Addition. 289 Ms. Larsen concurred that both would be approved. 290 Councilmember Lyden received information on the number of lots included in Phase 3. He noted 291 that with all the lots included in this phase of the development, there is not one odd sized one. 292 i. Consider Resolution No. 20-30, Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat 293 Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-30 as presented. Council Member 294 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 295 ii. Consider Resolution No. 20-31, Approving Development Agreement 296 Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-31 as presented. Council Member 297 Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 298 299 6D) Consider Resolution No. 20-46, Approving I-35E AUAR Update 300 Community Development Director Grochala explained the document, which is environmental in 301 nature and covers a study area of 45 acres dating back to 2005. Updates have occurred. There 302 have been projects in the corridor (map shown). This AUAR set up a conservation design 303 framework in the area of 35E. He explained what is examined and reviewed as part of the AUAR. 304 Different scenarios are allowed and have been considered (three scenarios noted). He noted a 305 development in the area that was able to proceed without environmental review because it was 306 already done through this document . He explained how the plan has been updated. Comments are 307 sought and have been received and included in the Appendix; changes were incorporated where 308 applicable. The Environmental Board has recommended approval. 309 Councilmember Lyden asked, looking at land use, what is the opinion on business campus versus 310 industrial and is there flexibility. Also what makes up the greenways along the freeway? Mr. 311 Grochala noted that the business campus classification is new to the comp plan and it would be 312 business/industry related such as technology; they still try to cast a wide net. Mr. Grochala pointed 313 out that the comp plan will still guide development. The greenway could be different things – trails, 314 greenspace, stormwater, etc. 315 Councilmember Stoesz noted Appendix F; will that be too restrictive. Community Develo pment 316 Director Grochala noted that the appendix is a required element and it identifies elements and what 317 how they should be handled. 318 Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-46 as presented. Council Member 319 Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none 320 321 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 322 323 There was no Unfinished Business. 324 325 326