My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-01-2020 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2020
>
06-01-2020 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2021 1:57:27 PM
Creation date
11/17/2021 11:39:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/01/2020
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Traffic Engineering Manual Chapter 13 <br />13-17 <br />≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≥ 45 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≥ 45 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≥ 45 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≥ 45 mph <br />2 lanes (with or without a raised <br />median)A A B D A A B D A A C D A B C D <br />3 lanes with raised median A A C D A B C D A C C D B C C D <br />3 lanes without raised median A B C D A B C D B B C D B C C D <br />Multilane (4 or more lanes) with <br />raised median2 A A C D A B C D A B C D C C C D <br />Multilane (4 or more lanes) <br />without raised median2 A C C D B C C D C C C D C C C D <br />Treatment Descriptions: <br />Specific Notes: <br />General Notes: <br />1. Adding crosswalks alone will not make crossings safer, result in more vehicles stopping for pedestrians, nor will they necessarily create a false sense of security. <br />2. Crosswalks have not been proven to create a false sense of security - research shows that pedestrians scan the road more at marked crosswalks. <br />3. Whether a crosswalk is marked or not, additional crossing enhancements should be considered. See the "Additional Treatment Considerations" section. <br />4. See MUTCD Section 3B.18 for additional guidance on using this table. <br />5. Lanes are total cross section. <br />2. Do not install a marked crosswalk where there are 3 or more through lanes per direction. Consider a pedestrian hybrid beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade separated crossing. <br />3. Traffic calming measures should be considered to reduce speed. <br />4. If a median cannot be or is not currently installed go to Treatment Type D. <br />5. Minimum acceptable median width to provide a refuge is 6 feet. <br />Table 1: Pedestrian Facility Treatments <br />A. Consider marked crosswalk and signs <br />B. Consider marked crosswalk with enhanced signs (R1-6a or R1-9a R1-9b) and/or geometric improvements <br />C. Consider marked crosswalk with signs, geometric improvements, and pedestrian activated warning devices4 <br />D. Do not install marked crosswalk. 3 <br />Vehicle ADT ≤ 9000 Vehicle ADT > 9000 - 12,000 Vehicle ADT > 12,000 - 15,000 Vehicle ADT > 15,000Roadway Configuration1,5 <br /> Guidance: Consider installing marked crosswalk with advance warning signs (W11-2); use S1-1 signs for school crossings. Consider in-roadway (R1-6) or overhead (R1-9a) (R1-9b) signs. <br /> Guidance: Consider installing treatment options from Type A treatments. Add curb extensions or median refuge islands. <br /> Guidance: Consider installing a raised median refuge island if one is not present. Consider installing marked crosswalk and appropriate crossing signs along with a pedestrian activated <br /> Guidance: Consider pedestrian hybrid beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade separated crossing. <br />1. Advanced stop lines and signing (R1-5b or c) should be used whenever possible if a multiple threat crash issue is present. Overhead signing, RRFBs or other overhead treatments should be used to mitigate <br />multiple threat crash risks. <br />Table 13-1 Pedestrian Facility Treatments
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.