Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />cost cannot lawfully be funded using a line item, allotment, or allocation within that budget or (b) the cost <br />is for a substantially different use from any expected use of funds in such a line item, allotment, or <br />allocation. <br />The “most recently approved” budget refers to the enacted budget for the relevant fiscal period for the <br />particular government, without taking into account subsequent supplemental appropriations enacted or <br />other budgetary adjustments made by that government in response to the COVID-19 public health <br />emergency. A cost is not considered to have been accounted for in a budget merely because it could be <br />met using a budgetary stabilization fund, rainy day fund, or similar reserve account. <br />Costs incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 30, 2020 <br />Finally, the CARES Act provides that payments from the Fund may only be used to cover costs that were <br />incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 30, 2020 (the “covered <br />period”). Putting this requirement together with the other provisions discussed above, section 601(d) may <br />be summarized as providing that a State, local, or tribal government may use payments from the Fund <br />only to cover previously unbudgeted costs of necessary expenditures incurred due to the COVID–19 <br />public health emergency during the covered period. <br />Initial guidance released on April 22, 2020, provided that the cost of an expenditure is incurred when the <br />recipient has expended funds to cover the cost. Upon further consideration and informed by an <br />understanding of State, local, and tribal government practices, Treasury is clarifying that for a cost to be <br />considered to have been incurred, performance or delivery must occur during the covered period but <br />payment of funds need not be made during that time (though it is generally expected that this will take <br />place within 90 days of a cost being incurred). For instance, in the case of a lease of equipment or other <br />property, irrespective of when payment occurs, the cost of a lease payment shall be considered to have <br />been incurred for the period of the lease that is within the covered period, but not otherwise. <br />Furthermore, in all cases it must be necessary that performance or delivery take place during the covered <br />period. Thus the cost of a good or service received during the covered period will not be considered <br />eligible under section 601(d) if there is no need for receipt until after the covered period has expired. <br />Goods delivered in the covered period need not be used during the covered period in all cases. For <br />example, the cost of a good that must be delivered in December in order to be available for use in January <br />could be covered using payments from the Fund. Additionally, the cost of goods purchased in bulk and <br />delivered during the covered period may be covered using payments from the Fund if a portion of the <br />goods is ordered for use in the covered period, the bulk purchase is consistent with the recipient’s usual <br />procurement policies and practices, and it is impractical to track and record when the items were used. A <br />recipient may use payments from the Fund to purchase a durable good that is to be used during the current <br />period and in subsequent periods if the acquisition in the covered period was necessary due to the public <br />health emergency. <br />Given that it is not always possible to estimate with precision when a good or service will be needed, the <br />touchstone in assessing the determination of need for a good or service during the covered period will be <br />reasonableness at the time delivery or performance was sought, e.g., the time of entry into a procurement <br />contract specifying a time for delivery. Similarly, in recognition of the likelihood of supply chain <br />disruptions and increased demand for certain goods and services during the COVID-19 public health <br />emergency, if a recipient enters into a contract requiring the delivery of goods or performance of services <br />by December 30, 2020, the failure of a vendor to complete delivery or services by December 30, 2020, <br />will not affect the ability of the recipient to use payments from the Fund to cover the cost of such goods <br />or services if the delay is due to circumstances beyond the recipient’s control.