Laserfiche WebLink
<br />For these reasons, drainage effects to Wetland 4 from Pond 200 construction are not <br />expected to occur. <br /> <br />• The current and proposed ditch crossing culvert invert elevations and size are equal <br />pre and post development. Therefore, drainage effects to upstream wetlands are not <br />expected to occur. <br />Per Kjolhaug Environmental Services <br /> <br />Appli cant is submitting a geotechnical report addressing the existing wetland & <br />soil conditions and present any proposals to protect the adjacent wetlands as <br />needed. See attached Wetland permit application. Geotechnical report to be submitted <br />when received. <br /> <br />4.A review of the DNR’s Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) Database <br />revealed that rare fea tures have been recorded in or near the wetlands on the property. <br />In 2002, toothcup (Rotala ramosior), a state threatened species, was located within <br />one wetland that is proposed to be filled. Autumn fimbry (Fimbristylis autumnalis) <br />and Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) have also been recorded near the <br />project site. The developer will need to coordinate with the DNR to obt ain a permit <br />for the take (destroy, dig up, dispose of, possess, or transport) of threatened or <br />endangered species. <br />MnRAM guidance and the 2017 Native Plant Communities Assessment Final <br />Report prepared by CCE S have been reviewed. Based on this review and for <br />WCA/RCWD purposes, vegetation quality for all wetlands onsite was <br />determined to be low, with an associated RCWD wetland degradation status of <br />marginally to severely degraded. Specifically: (1) rare plants found onsite are <br />not persistent and therefore item i of the special features tab in MnRAM does not <br />apply and vegetation quality is Low, and (2) although the Native Plant <br />Communities Assessment Final Report identified rare species onsite, the report <br />also states that (paraphrasing) “these rare species were located within areas <br />dominated by crops or agricultural weeds. While state-listed species do occur <br />within cropland and farmed wetland <br /> <br />areas, their presence alone is not enough to classify these areas as native plant <br />communities or rare native plant communities.” Rare plants were primarily <br />found in disturbed, annually farmed wetland fringe areas. Per Kjolhaug <br />Environmental Services. <br />5.The ghost plat shown in Outlot B on the north end of the project (Sheet 10) appears to <br />propose future wetland impacts. These impacts should be taken into account during <br />the sequencing efforts discussed by the Wetland Conservation Act Technical <br />Evaluation Panel. Road alignments should be considered that would minimize future <br />wetland impacts. The ghost plat is now shown to be proposed and has been <br />modified to prevent wetland impacts. <br />A permit to take has been submitted to DNR by CCES for all rare species <br />located in the development footprint (areas that will be physically <br />altered/graded/converted to another use). It is important to note that the