My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-23-2020 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2020
>
11-23-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 10:00:23 AM
Creation date
11/17/2021 11:59:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/23/2020
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br /> 42 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked that the cover be updated with a photo of the new water 43 <br />tower. 44 <br /> 45 <br />The mayor asked councilmembers to contact staff with any additional questions and to 46 <br />expect council consideration at the next council meeting. 47 <br />2. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Regarding Metal Roofs – City Planner 48 <br />Larsen reviewed a PowerPoint presentation including information on the following: 49 <br /> - Planning and Zoning Board directed staff to prepare a zoning amendment regarding 50 <br />metal roofs; 51 <br /> - Current zoning ordinance allows for standing seam metal roofs only (visual of 52 <br />standing seam versus hidden fastener was shown); 53 <br /> - Review of what neighboring communities allow (some don’t allow metal roofs, some 54 <br />allow similar to Lino Lakes; Blaine allows standing seam with restrictions); 55 <br /> - Staff report includes video links to attempt to show the difference between hidden 56 <br />and standing; 57 <br /> - A public hearing yielded no public comments; the Planning and Zoning Board did 58 <br />have a discussion and on a close vote approved the proposed amendment; 59 <br /> - Review of proposed amendment language; 60 <br /> - Ordinance is proposed for first reading at the next council meeting. 61 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked about those Planning and Zoning Board member s who 62 <br />were opposed; what was the reasoning. Ms. Larsen suggested it appeared to be mainly 63 <br />aesthetics. 64 <br />Councilmember Ruhland noted that he would not be present on November 9th and asked 65 <br />that the ordinance be delayed. Planner Larsen said staff would not object to a delay. 66 <br />Councilmember Ruhland wonders about the possibility of adding language that deals with 67 <br />how visible the property is. City Planner Larsen said restrictions can always be added to 68 <br />an ordinance but it’s inevitable that restrictions may not stay appropriate for all 69 <br />circumstances that come forward. 70 <br />Councilmember Stoesz suggested that the council could take up the matter when a 71 <br />resident comes forward with a situation that tests the regulations. Planner Larsen 72 <br />remarked that a resident recently contacted her about the council’s progress on an 73 <br />amendment. 74 <br />Councilmember Cavegn suggested that he also doesn’t like to think of whole 75 <br />neighborhoods with the exposed fastener roofs but he can think of situations where it is 76 <br />no t noticeable so he also wonders about adding distinguishing language. 77 <br />Mayor Rafferty remarked that there’s a quality and standard that he feels exists in Lino 78 <br />Lakes. He feels an exposed fastener looks fine on a structure covering a horse but not a 79 <br />house. He isn’t in favor at this time of changing the ordinance. He isn’t interested in 80 <br />reevaluating. 81
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.