My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-14-2020 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2020
>
12-14-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 10:00:23 AM
Creation date
11/17/2021 12:00:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/14/2020
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> <br /> <br />The property is currently zoned R-X, Rural Executive. Decks are considered accessory <br />structures and subject to accessory building setback requirements. Per Zoning Ordinance <br />Section 1007.080(2)(c) Setbacks, the required side yard setback for an accessory building (i.e. <br />deck) is five (5) feet. Furthermore, per Zoning Ordinance Section 1007.042(5)(b)1.c.ii, decks <br />shall not extend to a distance less than five (5) feet from any side or rear lot line. The variance <br />request would be for 2.7 feet. <br /> <br />The applicant states the existing side deck was constructed by the original property owners <br />between 1987 and 1991 approximately one (1) foot from the side lot line. The City has no <br />record of a building permit for the deck. In the late 1990’s, the applicant remodeled the side <br />deck to its current setback location of 2.3 ft from the east lot line. The City has no record of a <br />building permit for the remodeled deck either. <br /> <br />Unfortunately, neither the original deck nor remodeled deck was legally constructed because it <br />did not meet the 5 ft side yard setback. The deck cannot be considered legal non-conforming <br />and should not be repaired or replaced as is currently located. <br /> <br />Option <br /> <br />The applicant may construct a 5 ft wide walkway and stair case from the side of the house to <br />access the rear 16’x 24’ deck that is already under construction. Staff appreciates the <br />applicant’s desire to keep the existing side deck at its current setback location; however, it was <br />not legally constructed and should not be continued, replaced or restored. The rear yard has <br />ample space for the 16’ x 24’ deck. Staff also appreciates that the neighbor is not opposed to <br />the proposed setback; unfortunately, neighbor approval is not a criteria of approving a variance. <br /> <br />Findings of Fact <br /> <br />Resolution No. 20-131 details the findings of fact. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends denial of the variance. <br /> <br />The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the variance application on October 14, 2020 and <br />recommended denial with a 5-0 vote with 2 abstentions. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br /> <br />1. Site Location & Aerial Map <br />2. Applicant Narrative <br />3. Certificate of Survey prepared by Kurth Surveying, Inc. received by the City on <br />September 14, 2020 <br />4. Color Rendering of Proposed New Deck <br />5. Resolution No. 20-131 Denying Setback Variance for a Deck <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.