Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />organization as an individual but he cannot support taxpayer dollars. Councilmember 45 <br />Cavegn said he supports funds staying in the budget. Councilmember Lyden asked 46 <br />Public Safety Director Swenson to comment on the services provided to the City. 47 <br />Director Swenson explained the role of Alexandra House in the county and more 48 <br />specifically in this City. The council had received a presentation from the executive 49 <br />director at a recent work session. They are a good partner mainly in the area of domestic 50 <br />violence, a situation that does occur in this community. Councilmember Cavegn asked 51 <br />if they are called to assist in domestic violence situations and Director Swenson said it is 52 <br />protocol that officers bring in Alexandra House for their assistance. Councilmember 53 <br />Cavegn asked, if Alexandra House were not providing that service, how would the 54 <br />service be provided in Lino Lakes? Director Swenson said Alexandra House is the 55 <br />provider to this community and while other areas have other options, another would have 56 <br />to be identified for the City. Councilmember Cavegn asked the Finance Director the 57 <br />impact (to a taxpayer in the City) of this funding. It was estimated at about $.50 per 58 <br />resident. Councilmember Lyden noted that he sees this as a very important service. 59 <br />Councilmember Ruhland said he is trying to represent the majority of taxpayers in the 60 <br />City as well as wondering what other service that would be just as important. 61 <br />Councilmember Cavegn noted with that same theory, he would have a hard time 62 <br />supporting funding for Blue Heron Days. Mayor Rafferty remarked that the item will be 63 <br />removed from the budget. 64 <br /> 65 <br />Mayor Rafferty noted that the Park Board is requesting additional funding to the Parks 66 <br />and Trails funds. There has also been discussion about replacement of vehicles within 67 <br />the Public Safety Department. 68 <br /> 69 <br />On the vehicle question, the Public Safety Department is requesting three new vehicles. 70 <br />One current vehicle would be rotated to the fire division. The mayor said one vehicle that 71 <br />would be changed out has 15,000 miles on it and that would replace a fire department 72 <br />vehicle with 6,000+. The mayor has asked what it would take to keep that vehicle in 73 <br />place. The mayor also mentioned the option to replace Ford Explorer vehicles with a 74 <br />more expensive Chevrolet Tahoe and possible cost savings there. He would propose 75 <br />taking the savings of $17,000 and moving it to the parks budget. Councilmember 76 <br />Cavegn noted the vehicle discussion and that he is in favor of the purchasing the Tahoe. 77 <br />Councilmember Lyden remarked that the value includes the value when it is sold but the 78 <br />mayor remarked that isn’t the discussion now. Councilmember Ruhland noted that 79 <br />models have changed since the discussion has commenced; he sees that it would be a 80 <br />wash if the vehicles don’t increase in value any differently, i.e. one vehicle would gain 81 <br />value in a greater fashion. Councilmember Stoesz remarked that Explorer’s have worked 82 <br />well in the past so he would support purchasing them. Mayor Rafferty argued for the 83 <br />$17,000 that could be used in another way. Councilmember Lyden noted that the 84 <br />Explorer vehicle has inherent problems that cause mechanical repair cost. When asked 85 <br />to comment, Director Swenson said he has provided information and a recommendation 86 <br />and would welcome a council direction at this point. 87 <br /> 88 <br />Mayor Rafferty spoke in favor of reallocating savings (by purchase of Explorer instead of 89