12-13-2021 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DRAFT 5 Councilmember Ruhland asked about components envisioned and the developer 173 explained that they see the initial stage of about 100+ market rate homes. They are 174 looking at four stories for housing. They are looking forward as they consider possible 175 residents – younger people who want certain amenities – empty nesters who are renting 176 by choice – 30 somethings who come from outstate – and younger people who wish to 177 come back to the community where they grew up. The property is envisioned as 178 intergenerational. The developers also noted that there could be soil challenges where 179 the car lot has existed for many years; fortunately they have experience with super fund 180 sites. 181 Councilmember Lyden asked about having a four story building and how that can be 182 buffered from neighbors. Developer noted that the site provides for good buffering in 183 space and wooded area. 184 Councilmember Stoesz remarked that he’s seen some developments with tunnels to allow 185 access to multiple buildings. The developer noted the walkability of the area and the 186 positive culture that getting out in the neighborhood provides. 187 The developers explained the concept further. They added that they would envision 188 buildings with no more than 160 units. The mayor asked about the combination of 189 residential and retail on the bottom; the developers noted situations where that has not 190 been successful. 191 Councilmember Cavegn asked for public safety comments. Public Safety Director 192 Swenson said he expects there will be a review period for his department with more 193 details. Director Swenson added that there has been good experience with good 194 management so he knows that is key. 195 Community Development Director Grochala spoke on the issue of available utilities, 196 noting that the site has access to trunk lines for water and sewer. He also discussed 197 comprehensive plan guidance in the area of density; it does allow options for the council 198 to consider increases. Mr. Grochala remarked that staff wanted the council to hear about 199 this concept early rather than later; he is hoping to set up a joint meeting of the council 200 and advisory boards to hear about this proposal. 201 Councilmember Lyden remarked that the City is excited about the 49/J development and 202 that is a community gateway project. He hopes this can be the same; he wonders about 203 having a sign or something significant to indicate the gateway. 204 The council concurred with the concept of a joint meeting to review information on this 205 redevelopment idea. 206 3. Lake Amelia Woods Preliminary Plat – City Planner Larsen reviewed a 207 presentation that included information on the following: 208 209 - Land use application to subdivide two existing parcels into four rural lots to 210