My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-13-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
12-13-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2024 3:10:26 PM
Creation date
12/14/2021 12:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/13/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked if staff is also thinking about water treatment facility land 88 <br />needs and Mr. Grochala concurred that is on the radar. Councilmember Lyden asked if 89 <br />the City tracks vacancies and Mr. Grochala said there is some tracking, especially in the 90 <br />industrial area. 91 <br /> 92 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked about use of highway signs to bring people into the City, as 93 <br />is done by an adjacent City. Mr. Grochala remarked that the process is handled by 94 <br />MnDOT and comes with some requirements; the City doesn’t control the signs so 95 <br />businesses must seek those signs themselves. 96 <br /> 97 <br />Councilmember Cavegn asked if the goals come with any definition of success. What is 98 <br />success and how do we get there? Director Grochala said a work plan would follow the 99 <br />council’s approval of the work plan. Staff would work each goal with appropriate steps. 100 <br />He noted accomplishments since the last plan was adopted (2014). 101 <br /> 102 <br />Councilmember Stoesz suggested adding language supporting the sale of land that is no 103 <br />longer needed. Mr. Grochala explained that there are really only two pieces of land at 104 <br />this time owned by the City and he doesn’t believe they should be sold. 105 <br /> 106 <br />Councilmember Ruhland asked about opportunities for the tech corridor? Mr. Grochala 107 <br />remarked that there is a website sponsored by the multi-jurisdictional group that leads the 108 <br />tech corridor effort; there is energy in the data center community and they are working 109 <br />toward that. There have been a lot of looks on the corridor and it is an attractive site so 110 <br />he feels it’s just a matter of time. Mayor Rafferty suggested that the lack of municipal 111 <br />utilities and roadway is an issue so he wonders how staff is working on that; Mr. 112 <br />Grochala explained the current process for a route; there are some pieces in progress and 113 <br />others moving forward. 114 <br /> 115 <br />The council concurred that they would consider the plan at the next council meeting. 116 <br /> 117 <br />4. Personnel Policy 8.10 - Professional Appearance Policy Update – Human 118 <br />Resources and Communications Manager Sawyer reviewed her written report. Staff is 119 <br />recommending that the City’s Personnel Policy be amended by deleting the current 120 <br />language relative to “Professional Appearance” and inserting a “Dress for Your Day” 121 <br />dress code. Staff suggests this will be a positive change for employees and improve 122 <br />morale. Staff seeks council direction and approval. 123 <br /> 124 <br />Councilmember Lyden said he spent some time with staff on his questions about this 125 <br />change and is satisfied at this time. 126 <br /> 127 <br />City Administrator Cotton gave some examples of what would be allowed and what 128 <br />wouldn’t; staff feels that a policy update is warranted. 129 <br /> 130 <br />The council concurred on the policy change. Formal council action will follow. 131 <br /> 132
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.