Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br /> APPROVED <br /> 44 organization as an individual but he cannot support taxpayer dollars. Councilmember <br /> 45 Cavegn said he supports funds staying in the budget. Councilmember Lyden asked <br /> 46 Public Safety Director Swenson to comment on the services provided to the City. <br /> 47 Director Swenson explained the role of Alexandra House in the county and more <br /> 48 specifically in this City. The council had received a presentation from the executive <br /> 49 director at a recent work session. They are a good partner mainly in the area of domestic <br /> 50 violence, a situation that does occur in this community. Councilmember Cavegn asked <br /> 51 if they are called to assist in domestic violence situations and Director Swenson said it is <br /> 52 protocol that officers bring in Alexandra House for their assistance. Councilmember <br /> 53 Cavegn asked, if Alexandra House were not providing that service,how would the <br /> 54 service be provided in Lino Lakes? Director Swenson said Alexandra House is the <br /> 55 provider to this community and while other areas have other options, another would have <br /> 56 to be identified for the City. Councilmember Cavegn asked the Finance Director the <br /> 57 impact(to a taxpayer in the City) of this funding. It was estimated at about $.50 per <br /> 58 resident. Councilmember Lyden noted that he sees this as a very important service. <br /> 59 Councilmember Ruhland said he is trying to represent the majority of taxpayers in the <br /> 60 City as well as wondering what other service that would be just as important. <br /> 61 Councilmember Cavegn noted with that same theory, he would have a hard time <br /> 62 supporting funding for Blue Heron Days. Mayor Rafferty remarked that the item will be <br /> 63 removed from the budget. <br /> 64 <br /> 65 Mayor Rafferty noted that the Park Board is requesting additional funding to the Parks <br /> 66 and Trails funds. There has also been discussion about replacement of vehicles within <br /> 67 the Public Safety Department. <br /> 68 <br /> 69 On the vehicle question,the Public Safety Department is requesting three new vehicles. <br /> 70 One current vehicle would be rotated to the fire division. The mayor said one vehicle that <br /> 71 would be changed out has 15,000 miles on it and that would replace a fire department <br /> 72 vehicle with 6,000+. The mayor has asked what it would take to keep that vehicle in <br /> 73 place. The mayor also mentioned the option to replace Ford Explorer vehicles with a <br /> 74 more expensive Chevrolet Tahoe and possible cost savings there. He would propose <br /> 75 taking the savings of$17,000 and moving it to the parks budget. Councilmember <br /> 76 Cavegn noted the vehicle discussion and that he is in favor of the purchasing the Tahoe. <br /> 77 Councilmember Lyden remarked that the value includes the value when it is sold but the <br /> 78 mayor remarked that isn't the discussion now. Councilmember Ruhland noted that <br /> 79 models have changed since the discussion has commenced; he sees that it would be a <br /> 80 wash if the vehicles don't increase in value any differently, i.e. one vehicle would gain <br /> 81 value in a greater fashion. Councilmember Stoesz remarked that Explorer's have worked <br /> 82 well in the past so he would support purchasing them. Mayor Rafferty argued for the <br /> 83 $17,000 that could be used in another way. Councilmember Lyden noted that the <br /> 84 Explorer vehicle has inherent problems that cause mechanical repair cost. When asked <br /> 85 to comment, Director Swenson said he has provided information and a recommendation <br /> 86 and would welcome a council direction at this point. <br /> 87 <br /> 88 Mayor Rafferty spoke in favor of reallocating savings (by purchase of Explorer instead of <br /> 2 <br />