My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-03-2022 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
01-03-2022 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2022 5:07:28 PM
Creation date
12/29/2021 12:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/03/2022
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
One 0.015 acre wetland area was delineated within the project area. This wetland <br />meadow/shrub swamp was dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and tussock <br />sedge (Carex stricta). <br />No impacts to this wetland are proposed. <br />This wetland is part of the Wetland Management Corridor, so a vegetated buffer with an <br />average of 50 ft. and a minimum width of 25 ft. will be required per Rice Creek Watershed <br />District rules. <br />A minimum 10 ft wide drainage and utility easement is required above the delineated wetland. <br />It does not appear the northwest corner of the wetland is covered by a full 10 ft and this shall be <br />revised. <br />Shoreland District <br />The site is in the Shoreland Management District Overlay of Rice Lake. Rice Lake is <br />categorized as a Natural Environment Lake. Impervious surface coverage for a commercial <br />development cannot exceed 60%. The proposed commercial building is 24% impervious. <br />Required setback from the OHWL is 150 ft. The proposed building is 200+ft from the OHWL. <br />Shoreland district requirements are met. <br />Floodplain <br />There is no FEMA floodplain on site. <br />Additional City and Government Agency Review Comments <br />Anoka County Highway Department <br />Anoka County Highway Department reviewed the final plat and had no concerns. <br />Public Safety Comments <br />Deputy Director L'Allier notes a hydrant shall be located near the Fire Department Connector <br />(FDC). <br />The Police Division reviewed the plans and had no issues that needed to be addressed. <br />Environmental Board <br />The Environmental Board reviewed the development proposal at their November 30, 2021 <br />meeting. The Board recommended approval with minor revisions required. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.