My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-13-2021 Council Special Work Session Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2021
>
12-13-2021 Council Special Work Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2022 7:27:05 PM
Creation date
1/7/2022 10:53:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/13/2021
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br /> APPROVED <br /> 45 - Director DeGardner updated the council on some large ticket improvements <br /> 46 that are planned and possible costs; staff is already pulling back based on costs <br /> 47 and implications and trying to remain at the $900,000 funding mark(covered by <br /> 48 ARPA); <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Councilmember Stoesz asked what other cities are using ARPA dollars for. Ms. Lynch <br /> 51 noted that this City is using it for lost revenue, water, sewer and broadband; the main <br /> 52 requirement is that it be spent on improvements and not used for debt service or a rainy <br /> 53 day fund. Ms. Cotton explained that use allowed under the lost revenue category is more <br /> 54 open; she is seeing some use in other cities for capital costs such as parks and trails. <br /> 55 Councilmember Stoesz asked if the City should consider spending some ARPA funds for <br /> 56 other needs and Ms. Cotton noted approximately$900,000 remaining. <br /> 57 <br /> 58 Councilmember Stoesz asked about the role of the new position managing the facility— <br /> 59 would that person be presenting to the council? Ms. Cotton said she can foresee some <br /> 60 reporting but generally Mr. DeGardner will be reporting on the project and the activity <br /> 61 center to the council. <br /> 62 <br /> 63 2. Public Services Department and Organizational Chart—City Administrator <br /> 64 Cotton reviewed an organizational chart for the Public Services Department. Staff is <br /> 65 proposing to add a Public Works Superintendent position which would oversee utilities, <br /> 66 streets and maintenance. The parks supervisor would remain separate. She reviewed <br /> 67 additional positions proposed for the future (see chart—green boxes). She provided <br /> 68 information on the general responsibilities foreseen for the Public Works Superintendent <br /> 69 Position. On paying for this new position, she presented a scenario that has an$87 <br /> 70 impact to the General Fund. <br /> 71 <br /> 72 Councilmember Stoesz asked about the title and how jobs get scored. Ms. Cotton said <br /> 73 the value of the position will ultimately be dictated by the tasks required. <br /> 74 <br /> 75 Councilmember Cavegn said he understands the need to get additional staff but he wants <br /> 76 to understand the worst case scenario; Ms. Cotton said the numbers presented are that. <br /> 77 <br /> 78 With approval, staff would further develop the position description, post it internally and <br /> 79 move forward with recruitment. <br /> 80 <br /> 81 Councilmember Stoesz said he struggles with limiting it to internal candidates. Mayor <br /> 82 Rafferty said he stands in favor of the internal process because he sees talent there. <br /> 83 Councilmember Ruhland said he strongly believes in promoting from within. <br /> 84 <br /> 85 Staff anticipates bringing forward a recommendation for council consideration on January <br /> 86 7, 2022. <br /> 87 <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.