My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/12/2022 P&Z Combined Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2022
>
01/12/2022 P&Z Combined Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 10:46:40 AM
Creation date
1/7/2022 3:34:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/12/2022
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 8, 2021 <br />Page 4 <br />Staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit and site plan review for <br />Precision Tune Auto Care subject to conditions listed in the staff report. <br />Board Comments <br />Mr. Wipperfurth asked if the adjacent lot, 7920 Lake Drive, is also zoned <br />commercial. <br />Ms. Larsen commented all the properties along Lake Drive are zoned commercial. <br />Mr. Vojtech asked if there is any rule in place to limit how long a customer vehicle <br />can be stored on site. He also asked if there is a vehicle size limitation. <br />Ms. Eller said she did not think there are any requirements regarding storage duration <br />or vehicle size. <br />Mr. Evenson asked why a parkland dedication fee is not required. <br />Ms. Eller explained a parkland dedication fee is not required because it is an existing <br />lot. <br />Ms. Larsen added a parkland dedication fee is only applicable when a lot is <br />subdivided. <br />i10 <br />Mr. Evenson asked if a parkland dedication fee was received when the lot was <br />created. <br />Ms. Larsen said no. She stated the parcel is an existing lot from thel950s. She said <br />the parcel is likely not a part of a plat or an old auditor's edition. <br />Mr. Laden asked if staff received new architectural plans since the applicant's initial <br />submittal. <br />Ms. Eller said staff did not receive updated architectural plans. <br />Mr. Laden said he was not comfortable moving this project onto City Council. He <br />preferred the project return to the Planning and Zoning Board for review once an <br />architectural plan that meets the City's standard is submitted. <br />Mr. Root requested the applicant submit the southwest elevation, as viewed from <br />Lake Drive. <br />Chair Tralle declared the Public Hearing open at 7:01 p.m. <br />There was no one present for the public hearing. <br />DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.