My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-11-1996 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
1996 Packets
>
01-11-1996 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2022 7:21:30 PM
Creation date
1/14/2022 9:22:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
01/11/1996
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Failure to` give `mailed notice, or any defects in the notice, shall not invalidate <br /> the proceedings. At such hearing the city council shall receive any written and <br /> or <br /> statements, and hear, any petitioners for or against the proposed improvement*. <br /> A period of sixty days shall elapse after the public hearing before any further action <br /> shall be taken by the council on the proposed improvement. If within such sixty day <br /> period, a petition against such improvement be filed with the council, signed by a <br /> maiority of the owners proposed to be assessed for the improvement, or, when the im- <br /> provemerit has been petitioned for, signed by a number of the owners proposed to be <br /> assessed for such improvement at least equal to the number of those who petitioned for <br /> the improvement, the council shall not make such improvement at the expense of the <br /> property benefited, unless, in the meantime, there be filed with the council a petition <br /> asking that the improvement be made, signed by property owners proposed to be assessed <br /> for such improvement at least equal in number to those who signed the petition against <br /> the j govement; in which event the council may disregard-the petition against the im- <br /> provement. Any person whose name appears on a petition to the council for a local im- <br /> provement, or on'A petition to the council against a local improvement, may withdraw <br /> his/her name by a statement in writing filed with the council before such petition is <br /> presented to the council. <br /> Subd. 2. Regardless of the provisions in subd. 1, when less than 100 percent of <br /> the estimated cost of a proposed local improvement is to be paid for by special assess- <br /> ment, within the sixty day period after a public hearing has been held on the proposed <br /> improvement, a petition may be filed with the council, signed by a majority of the <br /> numbev of electors who voted for mayor in the last regular municipal election, Fro- <br /> testing against either the improvement, or the assessment formula, or both. In this <br /> event, the council shall not proceed with the improvement, as proposed. <br /> Subd. 3. When a proposed improvement is allowed-under the foregoing subdivisions, <br /> the council may proceed at anytime between sixty days and one year after the public <br /> -26- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.