Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />- Director DeGardner updated the council on some large ticket improvements 45 <br />that are planned and possible costs; staff is already pulling back based on costs 46 <br />and implications and trying to remain at the $900,000 funding mark (covered by 47 <br />ARPA); 48 <br /> 49 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked what other cities are using ARPA dollars for. Ms. Lynch 50 <br />noted that this City is using it for lost revenue, water, sewer and broadband; the main 51 <br />requirement is that it be spent on improvements and not used for debt service or a rainy 52 <br />day fund. Ms. Cotton explained that use allowed under the lost revenue category is more 53 <br />open; she is seeing some use in other cities for capital costs such as parks and trails. 54 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked if the City should consider spending some ARPA funds for 55 <br />other needs and Ms. Cotton noted approximately $900,000 remaining. 56 <br /> 57 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked about the role of the new position managing the facility – 58 <br />would that person be presenting to the council? Ms. Cotton said she can foresee some 59 <br />reporting but generally Mr. DeGardner will be reporting on the project and the activity 60 <br />center to the council. 61 <br /> 62 <br />2. Public Services Department and Organizational Chart – City Administrator 63 <br />Cotton reviewed an organizational chart for the Public Services Department. Staff is 64 <br />proposing to add a Public Works Superintendent position which would oversee utilities, 65 <br />streets and maintenance. The parks supervisor would remain separate. She reviewed 66 <br />additional positions proposed for the future (see chart – green boxes). She provided 67 <br />information on the general responsibilities foreseen for the Public Works Superintendent 68 <br />Position. On paying for this new position, she presented a scenario that has an $87 69 <br />impact to the General Fund. 70 <br /> 71 <br />Councilmember Stoesz asked about the title and how jobs get scored. Ms. Cotton said 72 <br />the value of the position will ultimately be dictated by the tasks required. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Councilmember Cavegn said he understands the need to get additional staff but he wants 75 <br />to understand the worst case scenario; Ms. Cotton said the numbers presented are that. 76 <br /> 77 <br />With approval, staff would further develop the position description, post it internally and 78 <br />move forward with recruitment. 79 <br /> 80 <br />Councilmember Stoesz said he struggles with limiting it to internal candidates. Mayor 81 <br />Rafferty said he stands in favor of the internal process because he sees talent there. 82 <br />Councilmember Ruhland said he strongly believes in promoting from within. 83 <br /> 84 <br />Staff anticipates bringing forward a recommendation for council consideration on January 85 <br />7, 2022. 86 <br /> 87