02/09/2022 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2022 Page 4 Board Comments Mr. Grochala said the traffic study addressed the pandemic shutdown. He said, according to MnDOT and MET Council, daily traffic counts have returned to pre - pandemic figures. He noted an annual growth factor of 1.4% was applied to the old traffic counts to reflect growth. Chair Tralle stated the apartment complex will not change the noise from the freeway. He said the City does not conduct studies on the number of kids in neighborhoods. Regarding the building's elevation, he said the apartment building will be four stories and it meets the City's requirements. Chair Tralle stated the gas line issue was an issue for the provider and it was not a City issue. He informed the public NorthPointe Garden Estates does not have any intent to be a part of the NorthPointe HOA. Ms. Larsen provided the definition of a planned unit development (PUD). City staff said once the land south of NorthPointe is developed, a discussion will be held about adding exits to help dissipate traffic from NorthPointe. Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend approval of the NorthPointe 81h Addition final plat and NorthPointe Garden Estates site and building plan review subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Vojtech. Motion carried 4 — 0. B. Lake Amelia Woods Final Plat V Ms. Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. The applicant, Tom Budzynski of TJB Homes, Inc., submitted a land use application for the final plat of Lake Amelia Woods. Two existing parcels will be subdivided into four, 10 acre lots in order to construct four new single family homes. Staff recommended approval of the Lake Amelia Woods final plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Board Comments Mr. Vojtech asked if decks will be allowed. Ms. Larsen said decks will be allowed, but they will need to meet the OHWL setback. Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Lake Amelia Woods final plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Mr. Wipperfurth. Motion carried 4 — 0. C. Robinson Property PUD Concept Plan Review DRAFT MINUTES