My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02-28-2022 City Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
02-28-2022 City Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2022 5:42:54 PM
Creation date
3/1/2022 11:19:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/28/2022
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br />131 <br />132 Bill Perry, Carl Street, asks if improvements will ultimately require a larger culvert under <br />133 the airpark. <br />134 <br />135 A resident of Carl Street noted that the lots on her street are generally one to ten acres. <br />136 This dense development would be quite change for the area. She asked that the council <br />137 keep in mind the life style changes that will impact existing residents. <br />138 <br />139 Mayor Rafferty remarked that he's witnessed three comprehensive plan updates and he'd <br />140 like more information on how this area has changed in that view. City Planner Larsen <br />141 reviewed previous maps and noted that municipal utilities becoming available can impact <br />142 the low density; she noted that Century Farms is actually medium density. <br />143 <br />144 Councilmember Lyden remarked that he is hearing residents explain that Carl Street is a <br />145 neighborhood and they don't want it to be changed by development of another <br />146 neighborhood. He sees that the connection of new development to Carl Street is the big <br />147 concern. City Planner Larsen remarked that there are things that could be done and <br />148 things that should be done. <br />149 <br />150 A resident explained that before they purchased their home, they contacted the City, <br />151 spoke with the City engineer and they were told that Carl Street would not be connected <br />152 to development as is being proposed now. Another resident concurred adding that there <br />153 is a drainage ditch that would seem prohibitive as well as protected species living in the <br />154 area. <br />155 <br />156 Mayor Rafferty added that it's a good thought to be fully open about the presence of an <br />157 airpark. He asked if staff could comment on the question about enlargement of the air <br />158 park culvert. City Engineer Hankee said at this point she could only offer that the storm <br />159 water regulations dictate that the amount of water staying on the site not exceed what is <br />160 moved away from the site. <br />161 <br />162 Councilmember Lyden noted that he will continue to be leery when discussions begin on <br />163 water volume and rate. <br />164 <br />165 Ian Peterson, development team, addressed the council. They wanted to get feedback on <br />166 the concept (noting density). They are working to update plans on comments received <br />167 from the advisory boards, etc. The big picture is that there are a lot of jurisdictions that <br />168 would be involved. As the federal government agency regulations change with <br />169 administrations, they are monitoring changes and those regulations have a great impact on <br />170 what can and can't be done. He remarked that what is being presented is a concept and <br />171 they are open to conversation. When asked if he could submit a plan that doesn't <br />172 connect to Carl Street, he said the original plan did not call for that connection. From his <br />173 perspective, the Carl Street connection is a public safety issue more than connected to the <br />174 developer's plans. <br />175 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.