My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-07-2022 Council Work Session Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
Searchable Packets
>
03-07-2022 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2022 5:43:25 PM
Creation date
3/2/2022 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/07/2022
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.6 Miscellaneous Water Quality Parameters <br />Other parameters that were monitored during this study included alkalinity, pH, water temperature, total <br />organic carbon (TOC), and coliform bacteria. Water temperature and pH were tested on site while alkalinity, <br />TOC, and coliform bacteria samples were shipped to a certified laboratory for testing. <br />Alkalinity: Raw water alkalinity averaged 255 mg/L as CaCO3 during the pilot study. Biological <br />filtration had minor impacts on alkalinity as the effluent concentrations were maintained around 250 <br />mg/L as CaCO3 during the treatment performance phase. <br />pH: Raw water pH averaged 7.0 SU during the pilot study. Effluent average pH concentrations for <br />Filter 1 and Filter 2 were 7.2 SU and 7.3 SU, respectively. The slight increase in pH is due to the <br />water being aerated. When water is aerated, it creates a turbulence which causes the dissolved <br />carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbonic acid in the water to outgas. Outgasification of CO2 and carbonic <br />acid from water results in pH increase. Effluent pH concentrations were maintained within the range <br />set by the treatment goals. <br />Water Temperature: Raw water temperature ranged from 50.2 OF to 53.4 OF and effluent water <br />temperatures averaged 53.9 OF. Microorganisms thrive in warmer and stable environments and the <br />lower water temperatures experienced during the winter months did not affect the performance of <br />the biological filters. Water temperature increased in the pilot skid since the ambient temperature <br />in the pilot trailer ranged between 50 IF and 60 IF on most days. <br />TOC: The raw water TOC concentration averaged 2.6 mg/L during the study. Filter 1 and Filter 2 <br />removed on average 14-percent and 16-percent of the influent TOC, respectively. Both removal <br />performances are on par with results obtained in other biological filtration applications. TOC <br />sampling was conducted both during the microbial acclimation and the treatment efficiency phases. <br />Coliform Bacteria: Coliform bacteria were tested during both phases of the study. All laboratory <br />results, both influent and effluent, returned absent E.Coli results. <br />Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM): Organic carbon in groundwater is predominantly natural organic <br />matter, which is typically derived from living or decayed vegetation. Natural organic matter can be <br />present in particulate, dissolved, and colloidal forms, and it is usually assessed when TOC exists <br />in the raw water. Disinfection byproducts (DBPs), which are suspected by the EPA to cause cancer, <br />can form in the drinking water when natural organic matter is present along with chlorine. This <br />occurs when chlorine is added to the drinking water for treatment. Higher chlorine doses and TOC <br />concentrations will lead to more DBPs being formed. DBPs can be assessed based on the TTHM <br />concentration in the water. The MDH waived the requirement to test for TTHMs during this study <br />as historically, the TTHM concentrations in Lino Lakes raw water have ranged from 94-percent to <br />99-percent below EPA's MCL. The future TTHM concentrations in Lino Lakes are expected to be <br />even lower if a water treatment plant is constructed as some of the TOC in the raw water will be <br />removed at the treatment plant. In addition, the TTHMs should become even lower with biological <br />filtration since prechlorination would not be used in the filtration process. <br />5.7 Filter Backwash Frequency <br />Obstruction to water flowing through a filter increases as contaminants are removed from the water and <br />accumulate in the media over time. This phenomenon is referred to as headloss through the filter. Headloss <br />will eventually reach a point known as terminal headloss, at which time the filter must be backwashed. If a <br />filter does not reach terminal headloss to initiate a backwash, weekly backwashes are still recommended <br />to avoid channeling and breakthrough of contaminants. The terminal headloss was set to 120 inches. <br />It is not uncommon for conventional water filtration facilities that treat groundwater to be backwashed every <br />2 to 3 days. On the contrary, biological filtration facilities tend to experience longer filter run times of 3 to 7 <br />days. Usually, the main groundwater contaminant affecting headloss buildup is iron, and water treatment <br />facilities with high raw water iron concentrations may have to backwash their filters as often as once per <br />Water Treatment Pilot Study Report <br />Biological Removal of Ammonia, Iron and Manganese at Well House No. 6 <br />City of Lino Lakes, MN <br />WSB Project No. 0 18601 -000 <br />Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.