Laserfiche WebLink
the Prairie du Chien aquifer will be issued. Staff has inquired about the possibility to cap <br />existing well no. 2 to allow for construction of well no. 7. Proposed well no. 7 has the <br />potential for better water and higher production than well no. 2 resulting in a net benefit <br />for the city. We are also discussing with DNR the potential to use a different aquifer for <br />production. <br />Of potentially greater concern is the DNR's proposed collective annual withdrawal limit <br />for White Bear Lake, set at an elevation of 922 that would have significant impact on <br />community use. The proposed limit would result in the need to reduce current use by <br />approximately 40%. That would be extremely difficult to achieve for domestic <br />(household) use alone. This would allow for no population growth and in accordance <br />with the water allocation priorities established in Mn. Statutes § 103G.261, would leave <br />no water for other uses. These would include commercial and industrial uses. <br />Recognizing the significant impact of such a decision the DNR has requested a hearing <br />with the District Court to secure guidance regarding implementation of this order. <br />Additionally, Lino Lake, along with several other NE metro communities have worked <br />with our state legislators on a bill (SF 3055) that would: <br />• Allow cities within 5 miles of WBL to continue to operate under their approved <br />water supply plans. <br />• Would not allow another lawsuit under the same statutes to be initiated. <br />• Requires development of a work group to explore options for supply drinking <br />water to these communities, allowing growth, while ensuring the sustainability of <br />White Bear Lake. <br />A hearing was held before the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Policy and <br />Legacy Finance Committee on Monday, February 28, 2022. The committee approved <br />sending the bill to the Senate floor for consideration. If approved in the Senate it will be <br />forwarded to the House for consideration. <br />At this time, the City is not subject to this requirement pending completion of the <br />contested case hearings. However, the DNR has requested the City voluntarily <br />implement the ban. Given that we are reaching late fall and irrigation systems are being <br />winterized, we do not believe any action is necessary at this time. We will continue to <br />monitor the issue and determine if any action will be necessary as spring approaches. <br />Staff is also expecting to schedule a presentation by Mn/DNR representatives at an <br />upcoming work session. <br />Requested Council Direction <br />None required at this time. Staff may bring forward a resolution of support for the <br />legislation currently being considered. <br />Attachments <br />1. Mn. Statutes § 103G.261 <br />