Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 22-02 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT <br /> WITH PRECISION TUNE AUTO CARE (7910 LAKE DRIVE) <br /> WHEREAS,the City has completed review of the site and building plans for Precision Tune <br /> Auto Care (7910 Lake Drive); and <br /> WHEREAS,the parcel is legally described as: <br /> (Per Trustee's Deed No. 2343673.002) <br /> That part of Lots 6 and 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 100,Anoka County, Minnesota, lying <br /> Northerly of the following described line: <br /> Beginning at a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 7 20 feet Northerly from the Southeast <br /> corner thereof,thence Northwesterly to a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 7, said point <br /> being 150 feet Northeasterly from the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 7 (as measured along <br /> said Westerly line) and there terminating; <br /> And lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southeast corner of Lot 6 at an angle of 64 degrees <br /> 19 minutes 30 seconds, measured from North to West, to the Westerly line of said Lot 6, and <br /> there terminating. <br /> Excepting therefrom, on all above, any part lying with the plat of Anoka County Highway Right <br /> of Way Plat No. 17; and <br /> WHEREAS, Section 1007.020(5)(d) of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires the execution <br /> of a site performance agreement prior to issuance of a building permit. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that <br /> the Site Improvement Performance Agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and Precision <br /> Tune Auto Care is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute such <br /> agreements on behalf of the City. <br /> Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of February, 2022. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember <br /> Cavegn and was duly seconded by Councilmember Ruhland and upon vote being taken thereon, <br /> the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> Ruhland, Cavegn, Lyden, Rafferty <br /> The following voted against same: None (Absent- Stoesz) <br />