Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission APPROVED <br /> April 13, 2006 <br /> Page 7 <br /> 264 is needed. She noted there are other issues coming before the Commission and this item needs to <br /> 265 be addressed in an unbiased manner. <br /> 266 <br /> 267 Motion failed with Commissioner Bening voting yes. <br /> 268 <br /> 269 MOTION by Commissioner Trehus to notify the City Council of a need for an extension of an <br /> 270 additional 45-60 days,which will still allow time for the amendment to be placed on the ballot. <br /> 271 <br /> 272 Commissioner Richard Williams asked if it cost a lot to place it on the ballot. Commissioner <br /> 273 Trehus stated there is already an election this year so it would not cost a lot. <br /> 274 <br /> 275 Commissioner Trehus speculated on how residents will view this Charter amendment and stated <br /> 276 he thinks it is an embarrassment and should not be on the ballot. He stated he thinks this can be <br /> 277 considered by the Charter Commission and Council. <br /> 278 <br /> 279 Commissioner Handrick stated her agreement that it would not reflect positively on either. <br /> 280 <br /> 281 Commissioner Bor stated clarity from the lawyer is needed so the Charter Commission knows <br /> 282 what is possible. She stated she supports the motion for an extension. <br /> 283 <br /> 284 Discussion ensued regarding the need for a legal opinion on whether it can be considered without <br /> 285 sending it to the voters and whether a Councilmember can be a non-paid non-voting liaison. <br /> 286 <br /> 287 Commissioner Duffy seconded the motion. <br /> 288 <br /> 289 Commissioner Montain noted a resident survey had been conducted to ask the people but now <br /> 290 discussion is occurring that this amendment should not be on the ballot. He speculated that the <br /> 291 500 plus residents who signed the petition and the Council expect it to be on the ballot. He asked <br /> 292 if a subcommittee should be formed to get additional information and then present a <br /> 293 recommendation and options at the July meeting. <br /> 294 <br /> 295 Commissioner Trehus stated it is not his intention to show a lack of respect for the voting public <br /> 296 but believed the 500 signatures were obtained under the guise there was a conflict of interest. <br /> 297 <br /> 298 Commissioner Montain called the question. <br /> 299 <br /> 300 The motion on the floor was read. <br /> 301 <br /> 302 Commissioner Trehus stated a date for the extension is needed. He stated it would be beneficial <br /> 303 to have some dialog with the Council before making a recommendation and suggested a joint <br /> 304 meeting be scheduled for July. <br /> 305 <br /> 306 Motion carried with Commissioners Bening and Montain voting no. <br /> 307 <br /> 7 <br />