My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2022-039 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2022
>
2022-039 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2022 7:28:20 PM
Creation date
4/29/2022 9:57:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
04/25/2022
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO.22-39 <br /> APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT <br /> 2022 EAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE UTILITY PROJECT <br /> WHEREAS,pursuant to the City Council awarding a construction contract to Dresel Contracting, <br /> Inc. in the amount of$547,438.11, on April 25, 2022; and <br /> WHEREAS,WSB and Associates has submitted a proposal to complete the construction <br /> services for the 2022 East Shadow Lake Drive Utility Project in the amount of$35,300; and <br /> WHEREAS,the City Council finds that it would be in the best interests of the city to proceed with <br /> the construction oversight and administration, <br /> NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,the <br /> Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with WSB, in the name <br /> of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction services of 2022 East Shadow Lake Drive Utility <br /> Project. <br /> Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 25th day of April, 2022. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember <br /> Cavegn and was duly seconded by Councilmember Stoesz and upon vote being taken thereon, <br /> the following voted in favor thereof. Cavegn, Lyden, Stoesz, Rafferty <br /> The following voted against same: None (Absent - Ruhland) <br /> ATTEST: Rd<J5 of ehy, MJyor <br /> a ne=ell, City Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.