Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> LAW OFFICES OF <br /> illiam G. -Hawkins- and Associates r <br /> LP-gal Assi IORI 2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH <br /> WILLIAh1 G. NAWKINS WeNDY B. DEZELAR ANo A, MINNESOTA 55303 -- <br /> BARRX A. SULUVAN PHONE(612)427-8877 <br /> i <br /> I <br /> July 2, 1996 <br /> Mr. Kirk CorSon <br /> 6662 Ruffed Grouse Road <br /> Lino: Lakes;. MN 55014 <br /> Re Charter Requirements for improvements to Existing Roadways <br /> Dear'Mt.`Corson: <br /> l am,responding to your letter of May 16, 1996 for my legal opinion concerning the <br /> appl'rgtile sections of the Lino Lakes City Charter, City Code and State law for <br /> improvements to existing streets including reconstruction, replacement and upgrading. <br /> In. your fetter you raised the question of the applicability of Minnesota Statute, Chapter <br /> 429 Chapter 6 and Chapter 8 of the Lino lakes City Code_ 1 believe Chapter 7 is the <br /> operative section as opposed to Chapter 6 cited in your letter which merely deals with <br /> administrative items. <br /> The first question that must be addressed is whether or not the proposed construction <br /> activity for the street constitutes routine maintenance or is an improvement. It would <br /> be my opinion that, if the construction activity lengthens the useful life of the road <br /> and results in market value increase to the adjacent properties, it would be deemed a <br /> local improvement and would be governed by Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City <br /> Charter. Construction activity such as widening the surface of roadways, placing a <br /> second lift of blacktop on streets, or removal of existing road surfaces and <br /> repiedement with new blacktop would constitute improvements. Maintenance items <br /> would be those activities which are normally anticipated at the time of the initial <br /> Construction of the roadway in order to allow the roadway to reach its normal useful <br /> life:. Maintenance items would be pothole repair and sealcoating of roadways, <br /> restriping and regrading of gravel shoulders. Routine maintenance items as those <br /> listed above would not be governed by Chapter 8 since they are not be deemed <br /> improvements which would increase the market value of adjacent properties. Such <br /> maintenance items could be paid from the general fund. <br /> Section 8.02 of the Charter and City Code Section 303, Subd. 1 define local <br /> improvements as 'public improvements financed partly or wholly from special <br /> `assessments.' Section 8.02 requires that any improvement of this nature must be <br /> carried out exclusively under the provisions of the Lino Lakes City Charter. Therefore, <br /> if'a road improvement plan results in benefits which would be specifically assessed to <br /> `abutting households, Chapter 8 of the Charter would govern the procedures. <br /> Minnesota Statute 429 is not the primary governing legislation in this area, however, <br />