My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-13-2005 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2005 Packets
>
10-13-2005 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2022 7:23:22 PM
Creation date
4/29/2022 10:42:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
10/13/2005
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Retention Until
Permanent
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br /> April 14, 2005 <br /> Page 5 DRAFT <br /> Commissioner Duffy stated she wondered how the situation got to this point. There was to be a <br /> meeting with the City Council but after a discussion with the League of Minnesota Cities,the <br /> Charter Commission was a pariah. It appears the Commissioners can not speak to the Council <br /> because the two groups were not allowed to talk to each other. <br /> Commissioner Handrick advised there was no common courtesy to let the Commissioners know <br /> before they arrived at this meeting. <br /> Commissioner Duffy noted there were many years of history with no issues. Now all of a <br /> sudden,the City Council cannot have a joint meeting with the Charter Commission. It appears to <br /> be so rush,rush and she wondered why the City Council needed to receive training. <br /> Council Member Carlson advised the decision to not have a joint meeting came after the training <br /> session. <br /> Commissioner Bor stated she attended the City Council's training,but saw it as a dialog <br /> discussion. She noted training had a didactic component with a clear objective. She thought it <br /> was an open dialog with some consultation. <br /> Council Member Carlson advised both attorneys were present at the training. She noted the <br /> Charter Commission Secretary could get a copy of the tape for the session and perhaps it could <br /> be cut down to the portions regarding the Charter Commission discussions. <br /> Commissioner Handrick questioned why the.decision was made at 6:00 p.m.not to have a joint <br /> meeting. <br /> Council Member Carlson advised the minutes do not contain that detailed information. They <br /> decided to tape the meetings so the information would be available. <br /> Council Member Dahl stated she has a taped copy of every meeting. It was easier than to go to <br /> the City to get tapes. <br /> Commissioner Warren advised the Commission of her concerns about the language in the April <br /> 12, 2005 letter to Mr. Heitke from City Attorney Hawkins. It stated"I do not believe that the <br /> City Council is under any legal obligation to engage in any discussions or obtain direction from <br /> the Charter Commission". She was further concerned that the City Council then received <br /> training that indicated it did not need to communicate with the Charter Commission. The power <br /> is vested in the Charter Commission unless the Charter is changed. <br /> Council Member Carlson advised there was discussion at that meeting of the importance of <br /> talking to and coming to an understanding with the Charter Commission. She thought sometimes <br /> in writing people come across differently than face to face. There was still confusion for her <br /> being told things had been talked about previously. She questioned the meaning of the word <br /> "modify" and asked if that did not mean"amend". <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.