My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-13-2005 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2005 Packets
>
10-13-2005 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2022 7:23:22 PM
Creation date
4/29/2022 10:42:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
10/13/2005
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Retention Until
Permanent
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br /> April 14, 2005 <br /> Page 7 DRAFT <br /> asked Mr. Heitke for information on what the Charter Commission did. Council Member Stoltz <br /> stated he probably received more training than the other City Council Members. He questioned <br /> where the two groups go from here and indicated he believed each member of the City Council <br /> and the Charter Commission needed to look within themselves for answers. He wondered why <br /> the 2003 referendum failed and did not know that answer. He noted the question needed to be <br /> answered so that each could determine what lessons were learned. Both the Charter Commission <br /> and the City Council had a role. They would not agree on every issue,but they needed to respect <br /> each other's position. Council Member Stoltz stated the City Council needed to be careful not to <br /> make blanket statements about the Charter Commission and vice versa. Everyone should try to <br /> get along. <br /> Commissioner Storberg advised the Charter Commission was really fifty-one percent(the <br /> majority)of the people. They have tried for 20 years to weaken the Charter. The City Council <br /> and the Charter Commission were two different entities. The City Council does not have 100 <br /> percent of the power. <br /> Council Member Stoltz asked why the two groups could not have the same vision. <br /> Council Member Bor asked how the City Council received the communication this was a we/they <br /> situation. She suggested that at the Fall meeting,the two groups should move forward to have <br /> better communication. She stated she has a deep respect for the process and noted the people in <br /> this City were educated. If the people would do the right thing,residents would end up with the <br /> right thing for the City. Council Member Bor stated she believed the Charter Commission could <br /> partner with the City Council to achieve this. <br /> Commissioner Zastrow advised the Charter was basically rules. The Charter Commission tries to <br /> interpret them. The City Council should be familiar with the rules which are like a road map. <br /> Commissioner Storberg advised that for the last twenty years there have been many different City <br /> Councils. Each one relied on the City Attorney and received the same interpretations. The City <br /> Council was paying for the same update. The real problem is that the City government does not <br /> want to be controlled by the Charter Commission. <br /> Commissioner Carlson advised if the Commissioner's role is to frame and amend the Charter, the <br /> Commissioners want to be informed before they make an amendment. They all want to feel they <br /> were well informed, and that information was covered from A through Z. That information has <br /> to come from the City Council and City staff. <br /> Chair Trehus asked where else could the Charter Commission get that information. He noted <br /> there was an election in 1995 to more or less remove chapter 8 from the Charter, and it failed <br /> horribly. The residents do not want to give up their power. After that, the City Council came to <br /> the next joint meeting and said the City could not fix the roads. The Charter Commission asked <br /> the City Council how they could say this when they had never tried to work within the charter. <br /> So the city decided to give it a try, and in 1997 there was a road project proposed and the <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.