My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/30/2021 Environmental Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
11/30/2021 Environmental Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 2:44:45 PM
Creation date
5/5/2022 2:44:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Minutes
Meeting Date
11/30/2021
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Board <br />November 30, 2021 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Nelson responded that each project has to address stormwater concerns seperately, <br />which includes rate and volume control for storm events not increasing due to the project. <br />He also noted that the wetland near this project was in Wetland Management Corridor, <br />and that efforts are made to avoid impacts to these wetlands. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan noted that the project seems like a good fit for the area, provided the buffers, <br />screening, and other landscape measures are in place. <br /> <br />Ms. Holmes wanted to confirm that the project is essentially clearing the site of all trees <br />and any new plantings will consist of new young trees with few, if any, existing trees <br />remaining. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson remarked that it is a drastic change in the appearance of a site when the initial <br />tree removals are done, but when looking at the long term plan for the site there will be <br />new native plantings and a diverse set of tree species on site. <br /> <br />Mr. Parsons inquired on the process of how the canopy cover requirements are met and if <br />they are based on mature size of the trees. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson stated that the coverage requirements come straight from city zoning <br />ordinances, including details such as the height of the tree and the location of the tree in <br />relation to surrounding hardscape. It is generally up to project architects to solve the <br />requirements and the city can work through requirements with them. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan asked for clarification on the stormwater management and grading for the <br />parking lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Nelson states that the majority of runoff water will infiltrate on site before reaching <br />stormwater inlets on Blue Heron Lake or the wetland. <br /> <br />Ms. Cavegn made a MOTION to approve the recommendations. Motion was supported <br />by Mr. Parsons. Motion carried 5 – 0. <br /> <br /> B. Conditional Use Permit for Precision Tune Auto Care <br /> <br /> Mr. Nelson presented a staff report that included a detailed discription of the site’s <br />characteristics. <br /> <br /> Staff recommended the Conditional use Permit for Precision Tune Auto Care be <br />forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council with the following <br />recommendations: <br /> <br />1. Mulch used for stabilization shall be type 3 certified noxious weed free mulch. Minnesota <br />Crop Improvement Assocation (MCIA) tags must be provided to the City. <br />2. A concrete washout area should be established on site and identified with a sign. <br />3. Tree inventory and preservation and mitigation plan must be provided to the city.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.