My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-13-2006 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2006 Packets
>
04-13-2006 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2022 7:23:10 PM
Creation date
5/13/2022 9:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
04/13/2006
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Retention Until
Permanent
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Julianne Bartell <br /> April 25, 2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> There is a different procedure that can be followed and which potentially does n t <br /> involve submitting charter amendments to the voters on a ballot. This procedure is <br /> set orth in § 410.12, Subd. 7. Under this procedure, it is initiated by a <br /> recommendation from the Charter Commission to the City Council to enact an <br /> ordinance amending the Charter. The City Council can adopt the ordinance but the <br /> vote adopting the ordinance requires an unanimous vote of the City Council members. <br /> There must also be a public hearing. The ordinance does not become effective until <br /> 90 days after passage to allow for a counter-petition requesting a referendum on the <br /> ordinance. If an adequate petition is received, the ordinance would not be effective <br /> until approved by voters. <br /> In this case, the proposed Charter amendment was initiated by citizens and not a <br /> recommendation from the Charter Commission. Consequently, the City Council is <br /> following the correct procedure. Should the Charter Commission wish to <br /> affirmatively recommend adoption of the Charter amendment to the City Council, the <br /> City Council could hold a public hearing and vote on the matter. If there was a <br /> unanimous vote to approve, the Charter amendment would be approved subject to <br /> the referendum procedures. If the vote is less than unanimous, the proposed <br /> amendment fails. <br /> realize that the City Council unanimously approved the proposed Charter <br /> amendment, i.e., unanimously approved sending the proposed amendment to the <br /> Charter Commission for review and comment. While it may be that the City Council <br /> would unanimously approve the Charter amendment based upon a recommendation <br /> from the Charter Commission, it may also be that one or more members of the City <br /> Council believe that the process should involve the voters as the proposed <br /> amendment does reflect a change in public policy. In other words, substantive <br /> changes to the Charter and the manner in which subsequent changes to the Charter <br /> are made are two separate policy questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.